Clarify the term "Drum Overheads"

straightup

New member
My band records at home. Our mantra is capture the live sound of us playing with minimal or no effects. We are a trio: guitar, bass and drums. We invested in some decent mics, stands and an all in one "old school" early 2000's digital recorder that has 8 tracks-at-once-recording, and all sorts of other mixing functionality. We worked on a new batch of tunes for about a year, meeting once a month. "At home" for us technically means a comfortable A Frame high ceiling studio space built into the back of a two car garage. My friend uses it as his art studio the other 29 days a month. I did a ton of research on mics and even more on drum recording techniques. During the course of my research I read over and over again the term 'drum overheads'.

What I'd like people to do moving forward is when they talk about 'drum overheads' to clarify in which setting they use the term, by adding for "full kit" or for "cymbals only". So, I propose when discussing drum overheads we can use short code: OH-FK to mean "full kit" and OH-CY to mean "cymbals only".

Why is this important? Well, there's a lot of knowledgeable people out there that have a lot to offer, but each recording situation is different. My recording situation is I have 4 tracks to record the kit. That is it. So, I have to maximize the drum overhead mics, via placement, type, etc. To those that have the luxury of micing the kit with more than 4 tracks, I am very jealous and envious by the way, these folks use the drum overheads for cymbals only. Mics work differently in each capacity. Clarifying any discussion about how you use your mics would be very beneficial to all.

I ask all of us in the community to try to use this short code moving forward: OH-FK for full kit overheads and OH-CY for cymbals only overheads. Get into it! If you've ever made a post in the past, edit your post with these details, it will really help the knowledge base we are sharing and building.

To wit, our situation - Warning: gritty details ahead! We started using Rode M5 matched pair as overheads in the Glyn Johns set up. While they were great at getting all the drums, the hi hat and cymbals were just too harsh and overpowering. It was for two reasons: we had not put any sound padding up yet, and I had the inputs on the recorder too high. So, I swapped out the 1/2 inch diaphragm M5s for 1 inch diaphragm CAD GXL 3000s. They weren't a matched pair, but I got two and used them as such in cardioid pattern. We added padding to the ceiling and walls, and I lowered the inputs on the two channels, and BAM! we got great well rounded drum sounds and cymbal crashes were perfect, not overwhelming and not lost either. But, the one drawback: the toms were lost in the shuffle with GXL 3000s. Man those M5s really did pick them up nicely. But for the record we just made, the GXL 3000s worked well enough and with the kick and snare mic'd separately, we got a huge drum sound - which is the centerpiece of our full band sound.

I read a lot about the most recommended overhead mics out there: AKG C414, Neumann u87, Oktava MC-012, Audio Technica ATM450, Beyerdynamic MC930, Shure KSM141, etc. etc. etc. I just hope that moving forward people can clarify their recording situation when describing what mics they use.

OH-FK for full kit overheads and OH-CY for cymbals only overheads. Get into it! We will all benefit from the clarification.

Thanks everybody.
 
LOL this is funny. Go back and edit all posts to conform to some arbitrary naming standard? Preposterous.
 
While we're at it, could everyone stop talking about flipping phase, please?

Lol. This reminds me of the time Miro tried to make everyone stop saying "mics". :facepalm:
 
How do you capture "cymbals only" with OH mics and avoid the full kit...?


Lol. This reminds me of the time Miro tried to make everyone stop saying "mics". :facepalm:

Naa...I never said or did that.
"Mics" is actually correct...IMO. :)

It was about the spelling that describes what you are doing when you use mics. Some people spell it "micing", which looks it should be read/pronounced as mice-ing (something you do with mice)....just like "mike" looks like you're talking about some guy in your band. :p

I prefer mic, mics and miking.

Plus...that was more of a goof than about some "standard".
 
To those that have the luxury of micing the kit with more than 4 tracks, I am very jealous and envious by the way, these folks use the drum overheads for cymbals only.

It's not that simple. Just because I have close mics doesn't mean my X-Y overheads are "cymbal only".
 
The matinee response has been overwhelmingly underwhelming. The responders have outed themselves as closeminded fluffers that have nothing positive to add to a discussion. 99.9% of their posts are probably this lame fluff, complete with avatar pics and signatures that take up half a page. How’s the view from your parents basement? Is your peanut butter and jelly sandwich and milk tray ready from the first floor?

The question raised about the term drum overhead is valid.

Since you closeminded people can’t help fluffing yourselves on anonymous keyboards, the wasted space is piling up on this forum topic. To those that actually have something to say, and not glorifying behind the scenes fluff, your weeding through this nonsense is appreciated. I look forward to the evening show, perhaps these fluffers will be in bed by then complete with nighty night story, and the real discussion can begin.
 
How do you capture "cymbals only" and avoid the whole kit using overhead mics, since you're using that terminology?

I want your technical explanation...not fluff.
 
The matinee response has been overwhelmingly underwhelming. The responders have outed themselves as closeminded fluffers that have nothing positive to add to a discussion. 99.9% of their posts are probably this lame fluff, complete with avatar pics and signatures that take up half a page. How’s the view from your parents basement? Is your peanut butter and jelly sandwich and milk tray ready from the first floor?

The question raised about the term drum overhead is valid.

Since you closeminded people can’t help fluffing yourselves on anonymous keyboards, the wasted space is piling up on this forum topic. To those that actually have something to say, and not glorifying behind the scenes fluff, your weeding through this nonsense is appreciated. I look forward to the evening show, perhaps these fluffers will be in bed by then complete with nighty night story, and the real discussion can begin.

Is there even a discussion to be had? With your very first post, you asked, demanded, that we alter our terminology to fit your basic rudimentary needs. On top of that, you suggested we go back and edit posts to retroactively alter regular recording-speak so you can understand it? Lol. With your second post you call us fluffers. The entire premise of your thread is idiotic. Thanks.
 
Fluffer: (n) A person on the set of a pornographic film employed to ensure the male actors maintain an erection between takes, by means of oral or manual stimulation.

Nice.
 
Looks like someone isn't going to last long.

A first post with demands, including getting members to retroactively alter previous posts to satisfy the desires of a new member?

As well intentioned as the first post may be, it ain't gonna happen. The second post complete with insulting the established membership seals the fate.

Ok, enough said. I'm hungry. I think I'll go upstairs and see if I can talk Mom into making me a PBJ.

:D
 
Yeah, your first post on the forum demanded that about 20 years worth of posts be modified to suit you.
If you can't see that this is weird, you're going to fit in here perfectly.

Welcome to HR.
 
Back
Top