Hi Microphone Experts,
I'm wanting to add a large diaphram condenser to my recording tool kit. My local sound folks (Santa Cruz, CA) loaned me a Cad E-200 and an Audio Technica 4050 (supposed to be like a 4030 but switchable), which I also compared to a small diaphram and a pzm. I tried a wide array of instruments and vocals. For my ears, the Cad E-200 was usally a bit more clear and clean than the 4050. Also, I don't have easy access to a Rode NT-2, so I'm wondering how that compares to a E-200.
I may just get the E-200 because it seems like a great mic, but since I haven't seen them mentioned in this forum I'm wondering about them. Are there problems with the E-200 that I should know about. I see the Octavia is often recommended, but since it's high cut-off is 16kHz, I thought it wouldn't be as good to catch some crispy high percussion and flute stuff that I do. What do ya think?
Thanks for all the great info all of you share on this site.
Sage
I'm wanting to add a large diaphram condenser to my recording tool kit. My local sound folks (Santa Cruz, CA) loaned me a Cad E-200 and an Audio Technica 4050 (supposed to be like a 4030 but switchable), which I also compared to a small diaphram and a pzm. I tried a wide array of instruments and vocals. For my ears, the Cad E-200 was usally a bit more clear and clean than the 4050. Also, I don't have easy access to a Rode NT-2, so I'm wondering how that compares to a E-200.
I may just get the E-200 because it seems like a great mic, but since I haven't seen them mentioned in this forum I'm wondering about them. Are there problems with the E-200 that I should know about. I see the Octavia is often recommended, but since it's high cut-off is 16kHz, I thought it wouldn't be as good to catch some crispy high percussion and flute stuff that I do. What do ya think?
Thanks for all the great info all of you share on this site.
Sage