Originally posted by chessrock
Man, I am getting so sick of everyone around here recommending that damn Marshall V67. Just because Harvey said it was good, and because it's cheap as hell.
At the time (about a year ago), the Chinese mics were starting to flood the market and most had a harsh top end and poor quality control. The V67G stood quite apart from these other mics, sounded very good, and was very inexpensive. I found the same thing with the MXL-603S over the more expensive MXL-600.
I posted a review of what I found because people who trusted my Oktava findings asked me specifically to look at the Marshall line of microphones. I was asked for my opinions; I didn't volunteer them.
I guess some people who know me (or my 50 years of experience in the music business as a consultant, musician, songwriter, producer, designer, recording engineer, and manufacturer) found some value in my reviews, since I've seen them quoted all over the place, and the people who bought them based on my recommendation posted similar results.
Come on. Are we just a bunch of sheep? What if Harvey decided, just for shits and giggles, to tell us all that our condensers would sound much better if we were to dip them in water, and then cover them with a fine layer of sawdust ?!
I haven't talked to Scott Dorsey about it, but I'd be willing to bet that my review of the Marshall 2001 probably contributed slightly to his decision to come out with his mod kit. Stephen Paul is currently looking at some possible mods for some of the Marshalls mics and others, as a result of my discussions with him.
I don't do things for "shits and giggles" - I'm very aware that whatever I say will be seriously considered by a lot of people and I tend to go very slow before recommending anything.
The ECM8000 was an exception, but I felt pretty safe about recommending it before mine arrived. Even then, I think I posted enough warnings in my original post about possible dangers in buying the mic, based on my recommendations.
I think we'd have a lot of wet condensers.
Hey, if it sounded better, why not?
Cwadroon, dare to be different. There have been a gazillion mic shootouts and audio clips posted in the last couple of months, and there has been a very noticeable trend I've spotted: The ones recorded with the AT 4033 all sound really good. I mean really good.
Damnit, I want one.
Then get one, damnit. All I've ever said about the 4033 is that it has a little too much high end for my needs (like a lot of mics made these days), and that if you're a new recordist, you may not hear that at first because "louder" and "brighter" sounds better - at first.
And simply don't listen to anything I have to say about anything.
Write Alan Hyatt and tell him don't send me any more mics to look at, write Mark McQuillkin at FMR Audio and tell him not to send out the RNMP prototype to me, write Taylor Johnson at the Sound Room and tell him you don't want me looking at the T.H.E. line, and you might wanna tell Karl Winkler at Neumann to stop talking with me.
I'll go you one better, chessrock; I won't post any more reviews about anything here again - ever. And I promise not to return any calls from Aspen Pittman about the new GT mics, even though I've known him for about 30 years. I hate to cut off these old friendships, but well, if that's the price of maintaining my integrity here, so be it.
I'll just post stuff about mic technique, theory, and placement, and leave the review stuff to others more qualified to review products, like professional magazine reviewers. If anybody wants to see my thoughts on products, I'll just post them at rec.audio.pro, or alt.music.4-track. RE, your moderator here, can post them on this group if he wishes (as he's done in the past).
In fact, my original review on the Marshall mics WAS first printed here by Weston (RE), not me.
I'm sorry if this sounds really shitty, but two people I respected just died this week, Waylon Jennings (who I've always admired), and Dave Van Ronk (an old dear friend from the 60s). Both were my age (65), so I'm not feeling very good right now myself.
I've tried to give back some of the things that I've learned over the years, to pay back some of the people who helped me when I was getting started, but posts like yours make it damn hard for me to keep wanting to do that. Sorry if that's a shitty attitude, but as I said, as a heavy smoker still, at 65, I'm starting to feel a little closer to not being around much longer, so I really don't have time for this shit if it's not appreciated.