Blink 182 said:
im having a hard time trying to justify putting simple basslines to songs. i feel just playing the root note of the chord is almost cheating as it is just enhacing what the guitar is playing, rather than having its own individual part. i think it sounds good, but i do feel it is just a case of me being lazy.
can anyone help me justify using simple basslines? or should i attempt to write more complex ones...?
thanks if anyone helps.
As a bass player, here's how I look at it. None of these are rules, of course, just personal concepts of mine. And they don't always apply.
1) The bass is not actually something that works with or against the guitar; it forms an independent rhythmic unit with the drums. In my mind a three-piece band (as a simple example) isn't made of guitar, bass and drums; it's made of a lead guitar and bass + drums. If you add a rhythm guitar, it
should seamlessly drop into the same rhythm unit or block. They aren't fighting each other; they're complementing each other by forming a larger whole than the individual parts.
2) Because of the nature of instrument, you've got a whole range of variations on a theme in a single guitar chord. Different voicings, for example. It seems to me that a lot of guitar players are latent bassists because they want to play power root chords on the lowest part of the scale on their lowest strings (why else would anyone want to play a 7-string guitar?) . Then they bitch about bass players playing
their parts and being unnecessary!
3) Conversely, there's absolutely nothing wrong with a bassist playing a riff within the scale as long as the guitar is doing its part to hold tight rhythm with the drums.
I hope I didn't step on any toes here. I'm kind of tired and may sound blunter than I need to.
Do me a favor and listen to "Raise The Star" and especially "Driving In Cars" at my link below. I write all my stuff on a guitar and then bring in the bass later. Maybe it will give you an idea or two?