bennychico11
...
Anyone seen anything about this....or tried it:
http://mixonline.com/mixline/bag-end-etrap/
http://mixonline.com/mixline/bag-end-etrap/
Hmm sounds interesting, but isn't the concept just the same as using EQ to sort room problems?Anyone seen anything about this....or tried it:
http://mixonline.com/mixline/bag-end-etrap/
Hmm sounds interesting, but isn't the concept just the same as using EQ to sort room problems?
the e-bag seems like a decent option if its cost effective...
I meant your point that it improves only one location. I don't really understand the other part.It's not the same as using EQ, but it suffers from the same basic problem: It improves only one location in the room, versus passive bass traps that help everywhere. But unlike EQ, an active bass trap has the potential to improve nulls and reduce ringing.
Another limitation of this particular trap is it can be tuned to work at only two frequencies. But all rooms have problems at all bass frequencies.
--Ethan
I meant your point that it improves only one location. I don't really understand the other part.
If you show me the statement(s) you don't understand I'll be glad to explain.
--Ethan
Ethan Winer said:But unlike EQ, an active bass trap has the potential to improve nulls and reduce ringing.
I don't actually understand how the E-trap works, and how it can reduce ringing.