Seeing as how I'm usually sitting at table 7, I pan the entire band between 1 and 2 o'clock right, with the keyboards in the distance, the lead guitarist closest , the front man wide left at 1 o'clock, and the drums clustered together wide right at 2 o'clock. Because that's what I'm used to and feels right to me.
Seriously, it entirely depends upon the arrangement and the mix. If I'm doing a standard stereo image with kick and maybe snare, it will usually be oriented from an audience perspective, but the pan width and center location of that image could be anywhere. I make no assumption that it will be centered kick on center and fully spread L-R.
But almost as often - especially in one of those silly 10 mic setups, I'll take advantage of the situation and turn that kit inside-out in 4 dimensions and ignore any kind of sensible resemblance to an actual physical kit altogether. I've been examining some commercial recordings lately where sub-instrument location can even be different from verse to chorus to bridge in such situations.
I was just watching the Blue Man Group DVD of their live concert tour not long ago (yes I subscribed to PBS
). These guys have - simultaneously - two drummers with full kits, three more drummers standing and playing three large tom racks, and the three Blue Boys themselves banging on their PVC tubes. Tell, me, which of those EIGHT drummers on stage all playing at once would you consider to have the right perspective? Or would it be right to use standard audience perspective? For the latter, there'd be so many drums all over the pan space that there'd be no room for anything else. You gotta go custom with the knobs there.
I know that the Blueheads are an extreme example, but there's zero reason why that idea of custom panning can't translate down to a standard 5-piece combo with one drummer on a single standard kit.
G.