knightfly
GrouchyOldFartOnBatteries
Just a reality check here - I've been asked a lot of questions on acoustics, probably because I try to help where I can, but I'd like everyone to know some background, just so you know how much weight to give my answers in this particular area, and where the bulk of my comments come from.
First, the vast majority of my limited knowledge of acoustics comes from studying everything I could get my hands on, after building a "studio" room about 12 years ago. It was a complete letdown - I learned right then that -
1. Egg cartons do about 1% of what has been attributed to them, if that. None of which is sound PROOFING.
2. Standard 2x4 stud construction, even with heavy insulation, sucks.
3. Without a caulking gun and many other methods of sealing stuff, you ain't shit.
4. 12 feet isn't wide enough for a working control room if you're even half-assed serious, nor is 8 feet a tall enough ceiling.
5. Having a bunch of rattle-prone musical instruments in the same room with live mics is stupid, unless you're making a record about rattles.
6. Most acoustically oriented building material are 'way too expensive for working people.
7. Couple hundred more epiphanies, but these will do to make my point...
THE POINT - I don't want ANYONE here to mistake STUDY, no matter how much of it, for EXPERIENCE. My own very limited experiences have taught me that I need a lot more experience to be called even an AMATEUR acoustician, not to mention a few more decades of study. So, just in case anyone has any doubts, here is -
RULE #1 - ANY time John (there are others, too) contradicts or modifies anything I've commented on, PAY ATTENTION. (I certainly do) If I don't understand anything John says, I'll ask my own questions...
It should be obvious to anyone who pays attention, that John's knowledge of this area is a few orders of magnitude greater, and that that knowledge is backed by a huge amount of practical experience WHICH I LACK.
For all of you who already knew all this and remembered it, and who therefore ALREADY ignore my comments, just continue to do so; in fact, don't even read this...
It just seemed like I was getting too much credence in this area by people looking for answers, and I wanted to make sure you all know where my information comes from. Anyone here can buy a few hundred dollars worth of books and study them for a while and find the same answers.
RULE #2 - Any questions, see RULE #1...
I've dropped small, similar comments in various posts indicating some of the above - I hope this doesn't come across as being egotistical, it certainly isn't intended that way - I'm just trying not to mislead anyone, yet still help where I can. John, your site in particular has been an oasis for me. I hope to steal all your ideas/plans I can run with when I start my new (real) studio in a couple of years. Thank you, to about the 12th power. I'm gonna shut up now. Well, for a minute anyway... Steve
First, the vast majority of my limited knowledge of acoustics comes from studying everything I could get my hands on, after building a "studio" room about 12 years ago. It was a complete letdown - I learned right then that -
1. Egg cartons do about 1% of what has been attributed to them, if that. None of which is sound PROOFING.
2. Standard 2x4 stud construction, even with heavy insulation, sucks.
3. Without a caulking gun and many other methods of sealing stuff, you ain't shit.
4. 12 feet isn't wide enough for a working control room if you're even half-assed serious, nor is 8 feet a tall enough ceiling.
5. Having a bunch of rattle-prone musical instruments in the same room with live mics is stupid, unless you're making a record about rattles.
6. Most acoustically oriented building material are 'way too expensive for working people.
7. Couple hundred more epiphanies, but these will do to make my point...
THE POINT - I don't want ANYONE here to mistake STUDY, no matter how much of it, for EXPERIENCE. My own very limited experiences have taught me that I need a lot more experience to be called even an AMATEUR acoustician, not to mention a few more decades of study. So, just in case anyone has any doubts, here is -
RULE #1 - ANY time John (there are others, too) contradicts or modifies anything I've commented on, PAY ATTENTION. (I certainly do) If I don't understand anything John says, I'll ask my own questions...
It should be obvious to anyone who pays attention, that John's knowledge of this area is a few orders of magnitude greater, and that that knowledge is backed by a huge amount of practical experience WHICH I LACK.
For all of you who already knew all this and remembered it, and who therefore ALREADY ignore my comments, just continue to do so; in fact, don't even read this...
It just seemed like I was getting too much credence in this area by people looking for answers, and I wanted to make sure you all know where my information comes from. Anyone here can buy a few hundred dollars worth of books and study them for a while and find the same answers.
RULE #2 - Any questions, see RULE #1...
I've dropped small, similar comments in various posts indicating some of the above - I hope this doesn't come across as being egotistical, it certainly isn't intended that way - I'm just trying not to mislead anyone, yet still help where I can. John, your site in particular has been an oasis for me. I hope to steal all your ideas/plans I can run with when I start my new (real) studio in a couple of years. Thank you, to about the 12th power. I'm gonna shut up now. Well, for a minute anyway... Steve