Only to the deaf.
And isn't the point of asking for advice is to try to get closer and closer to the grand sounds we hear on our favorite productions? It doesn't make any sense to compare yourself to anything less!
This guy feels that the 16 tracks of drums are servicing him well. That is great. I will not argue. The production is pretty good. Not Metallica black album good, but certainly MUCH better than the average home recording I usually hear here. So, the difference seems to be that this guy used 16 tracks, instead of the usual 4-10 that most around here use (okay, most around here seem to use kontact or ezdrummer....). About half of what they used on the black album, but about twice as good as the normal production I hear around here. I think it is a fair point to make that maybe guys are doing themselves a disservice by limiting themselves to close minded thinking about how many drum tracks they "need".
I gotta tell you, if I had 40 mics and channels available all at once at tracks and could pick about 20 of them to use for any particular song (black album production), I would do it every time! If I didn't have that many, I would "make do" with the 8-10 tracks that I normally can afford. But, I would NEVER say that I can always get with 8-10 that I could with 20, 30, 40 mics available at once. That is idiotic! Of course having that many sources available to blend together is going to produce stellar results if implemented properly.
Some of the posts here have came across with a lot of arrogance, and from those people I have heard nothing that can back that kind of arrogance. Just sayin'......