B
Beck
Guest
… reading thru my manual earlier today - it says in one area that they 'recommend' using MRL tapes set for NAB.
(Granted, it also says that it's 'switchable' as well) - but with that said - does this mean I better stick with 'NAB' over 'IEC'?
Also, a few other things to mention: when reading the part about 'setting up for alignments' - it has a 'requirement' list of things I 'must have' before doing any alignments.
One of the things it says I must have, is something called an 'extender board'. Have you (or anyone) know what this is? I've never heard any of you ever mention one of these before.
Another thing it mentions (as far as using or selecting a 'tape' to record on) is either 'Scotch 226' or equivalent. I've never even heard of 226 tape before. But more importantly, what is today's 'equivalent' for that tape? - or is it all that important to stick & use that particular tape anyway?
For a half-track mastering deck NAB is the standard in the USA. Though standards don't mean as much as they used to when tape was king, I still use NAB EQ for half-track (even up to 4-track). For multitrack reel-to-reel (8 or more tracks) I use IEC.
An Extender Card or Board allows easier access to rec/play amp cards. You pull the rec/play amp card and put the Extender card in the slot and then plug the rec/play amp card into the extender card. With some machines you can't even get to the tweakers without one.
226 was 3M's equivalent to Ampex 456. Calibrate with whatever tape you plan to use, be it Quantegy 456, RMGI SM911, etc. Don't go looking for NOS 226 because it's terrible for sticky-shed. 226 was great tape in its day, but all that I had went sticky long ago.