Search results

Planning to buy back my original Scully 280 4-track I had 12 years ago, yep. That was my all-time favorite multi-track machine … I’ve had a few other 280s but none of them sounded like that particular one (an early one I believe).

Thanks for any leads!

Found one to buy from a fellow who refurbishes them, so should be all good now, thanks.

I’d grab that real quick … unfortunately it sold 5 years ago 😃

I like the sound + the ‘70s vibe of the design. Reminds me more of the old school Teac sound (like the Model 5 vs M35). Also prefer the simplicity of the EQ and layout.

Yeh I’m happy to pay a premium for a working deck … unfortunately none of them on Reverb are functional. Looking for a tech to mail one off to; in that event I would just grab the best one on Reverb.

Hey folks, Looking for a 144 4-track cassette deck in good working condition (or contact with techs that can refurb them). Thanks for any leads.

I bought the 1/2” reel from Sweetbeats awhile back and found 1 additional reel, but will need a couple more reels as well.

Cool … you wanna sell it to me? 😃

Of course anyone can post whatever opinions they wish, again ... but: what is the purpose of posting this here? What "open debate" are you looking to have, and with whom? I trust you will find 95%+ agreement with your views in literally every part of every audio form across the entire internet...

You’re free to post whatever you want, however you should expect some impassioned responses, considering the audience you are posting to. Why is there such a focus on “measurable” quality? Quality is in the results. Which is subjective. It’s odd to say the negatives are never spoken about...

1. I do not use tape as an “effect”. It’s a recording medium which sounds very different from digital. 2. Of course I want decks to perform as well as they can, and of course I like them calibrated. You can calibrate your deck however you want … different tape types behave differently on...

The thing is you are saying literally the same thing that any most any modern digital recordist would say. It’s not news. All the points you made are standard boilerplate reasons why “digital is better”. How about I reverse everything you said in favor of analog, and make a post in a standard...

A medium being “just there to collect the sound” is an opinion I strongly disagree with … just as many would disagree that a guitar amp is “just there to amplify the sound”, and therefore the cleanest, most convenient, and least expensive option that accomplishes that task should win.

My statement is a simple, factual statement regarding my own working methods. Would you call someone saying “it’s impossible for me to get the sounds I’m after without a Stratocaster … a Les Paul just can’t do it” snobbery?

… for me, it’s impossible to make the kind of records I’m after digitally. So I continue to accept the flipside of the coin too.

Well … no surprise that most people like digital better. It’s cheap and convenient and one does not have to deal with the concerns you noted above. It is somewhat dismaying to see another “tape sucks” thread in this forum though. However, a Revox and 4-track cassette deck are not Ampex or...

I’ve never heard of any Akai machine being anywhere near the level of even a Teac or Tascam, much less an old school “pro” studio deck. I was personally never very impressed with Revox- I had an OG 15 ips A77, and found the Tascam 22-2 to sound better and be more usable. I agree w Sweetbeats...

Well, I have a friend who’s super into fountain pens. And there are fountain pen communities. He can restore fountain pens, and they can be worth a significant amount of money. But no one is going to say, “well sure fountain pens are cool but if you are going to write a report for work, they...

Yeh I’m not a big fan of cassette multi track at this point … but I would use them if that was all that existed. Digital, not so much. To me, it’s the difference between photoshop and oil paint and canvass. I understand this is a minority opinion, and mang simply see the medium as capture method...