I mean, I guess if you continue to ignore what an ad hominem fallacy actually is, then yeah, we technically could. So...ok. yeah.
sheesh, you're still on that? I'm back up, my head is a little foggy and you're eating into my coffee time, but...
Not too long ago there was a thread here, some guy said something like, "where credit is do". So I kind of gently called attention to it, then kind of intentionally provided other commonly made mistakes. I guess to say, don't sweat it, it happens sometimes....
tow the line, saying "your" when one means to say "you're". "Rediculous" is another. I incorporated it into sentences that made
since. (improper and over use of "that" is another, i'm working on it) Obviously for some folks it was not important what I was saying, but how I said it. I was corrected several times by several people. Not sure what the point is, but there you go.
We've all observed discussions and/or arguments online where some holier than thou proclaims to another, "your uneducated, blah blah blah". I say blah blah blah, because when someone says something like that it is cringe worthy, you tend to
hear little else, because it kind of negates anything else the person had to say, especially when whatever else the person had to say was predicated on the claim tht someone else was uneducated. Now, what if someone else piped-in and said, "you're calling someone else uneducated when you cannot be bothered to learn to communicate using proper grammar?". Someone else calls foul, "that's an ad hominem attack, address the point he is making rather than attack his improper grammar and apparent lack of education". THe response comes, "it's not an ad hominem, he made the argument that "your uneducated" while demonstrating his own lack of education". The argument made, the point is, education, who haz it and who doesn't haz it.
I don't know. I guess it boils down to, if you claim someone else
was uneducated, in doing so you might want to be careful to not demonstrate your own lack of education. If not managed, your fair game.
Funny it appears you do not agree, yet your kind of doing the same thing. It is an unfair ad hominem for Mac Doobie to attack LeBron James use of improper grammar when he made the claim that (2.8 million) other people
was uneducated, stick to the point. The point is, Mac Doobie doesn't even know what ad hominem means.
Anyway, i'm not certain any of that made sense. I need more coffee. more. coffee. You guys have a good day. Keep fuckin' that chicken.