Jerry Kahn
New member
OK, nobody on the Analog forum answered this, so I am trying again here. It probably sounds like apples and oranges, but bear with me (and if your a girl, "bare" with me...huh..).
Here it is: would anyone like to comment on the sound quality of a TASCAM 488 (casette deck) vs 16 bit digital audio-- recorded, say, with an old Audiomedia III card and an old Mac.
I am thinking of picking up a 488 to do some recording with until I can afford a new computer setup (24 bit) which might, at this rate, be a couple of months. My other option is to upgrade my hard disk situation on my old mac (it's full) and continue to use that for a while.
In either case it is a temporary fix-- but I am also curious of the benifits of NOT recording with a computer. There are a number of people who feel that because tape medium is LESS flexible, but FASTER TO SET UP AND USE, you can be more productive in certain ways, and possibly more creative -- of course that depends on a lot of factors.
Blah Blah.. anyway thanks for listening. Any feedback would be appreciated.
peace,
jk
Here it is: would anyone like to comment on the sound quality of a TASCAM 488 (casette deck) vs 16 bit digital audio-- recorded, say, with an old Audiomedia III card and an old Mac.
I am thinking of picking up a 488 to do some recording with until I can afford a new computer setup (24 bit) which might, at this rate, be a couple of months. My other option is to upgrade my hard disk situation on my old mac (it's full) and continue to use that for a while.
In either case it is a temporary fix-- but I am also curious of the benifits of NOT recording with a computer. There are a number of people who feel that because tape medium is LESS flexible, but FASTER TO SET UP AND USE, you can be more productive in certain ways, and possibly more creative -- of course that depends on a lot of factors.
Blah Blah.. anyway thanks for listening. Any feedback would be appreciated.
peace,
jk