with sonar you get advice of all the folks here in a light hearted and extremely helpful, faster than a speeding bullet,fashioned response.
If with the help of my friends here,I can record and get something listenable, then surely this program even works for the musically handicapped
I used to record using a 4 track but it always sounded like me. With sonar I can change things until my hearts content as far as eq,volume dynamics, tracks , buss, and effects and it does not suffer any degradation to my deaf ears.
I believe Sonar also has a bigger market share which means more experience to exchange with others. As well as more $ put back into the R&D at the company.
Sonar is pretty stable.
Sonar is intuitive and easy to navigate.
Sonar is constantly improving but the back side of that is that the improvements are usually worth paying for! the upgrades just keep getting more and more frequent. And right now you can get a firstime purchase of Sonar 3 with a free uprade to Sonar4 for less than $400
Then again, you can go buy cubase and come back and tell us why we should dump our sonar. Personally I tried cubase in the beginning of learning the DAW and I never learned how to get it to do what I needed. The Gurus here can really make a big diffference in the programs useability, therefore I am here
as the proud owner and addict of the last 3 versions of Sonar. And an experimenter who inhaled, with a few earlier versions of Cakewalk
If they will drop the upgrade price from $179 to $99 to go from producer 3 to producer 4 Ill be an owner of that one as well.
Dont forget that the name Sonar actually has something to do with Sound
The name cubase is the special edition of an antagonistic and repressive communist governed carribean island .
CUBA SE what does that have to do with recording?
My 2 cents
Hmmmmm this guy asked this questions 2 years ago! who am I talking to?
I need to get a life