powderfinger
New member
I've got an MXL 93v, 2 octava 012s, a shure 58......will any of these cut it for micing a kick drum?
Humm, you could try the MXL93V as the others said, or try the SM58 in the kick. Or you could even try X/Y with the Octava MC-012' s at about 6ft high and about 6ft out in front of the kit... and record the whole kit with just two mic's.powderfinger said:I've got an MXL 93v, 2 octava 012s, a shure 58......will any of these cut it for micing a kick drum?
Speeddemon said:Put the SM58 on snare (maybe remove the ball)
Speeddemon said:Put the SM58 on snare (maybe remove the ball)
I agree that it's more subsceptive to lethal blows, but the added high(mid) response might help a duller snare IMO.Fletcher said:Why on earth would you even think about removing the ball?
Besides changing the acoustic signature of the mic in a not so insignificant manner... you're opening up the transduction element to a world of pain if it gets whacked.

DJL said:I agree with Fletcher... your only asking for trouble when it get wacked. Oh, and the Shure SM57 and SM58 don't sound to same (even if you remove the ball)... close yes, but not the same.
lomky said:this is directly from the Shure website. It's probably where alot of this info is coming from:
The SM58 and the SM57 share the same mic element, the Unidyne III. The only difference between the these two models is the grill design.
The grill design does affect the high frequency response, particularly above 8,000 Hz.
The SM57 grill design allows more proximity effect because the mic diaphragm can be placed closer to the sound source. Proximity effect increases each time the distance from the mic to the source is halved. When a mic is placed very close, it is quite easy to halve the distance: 1 inch to 1/2 inch; 1/2 inch to 1/4 inch; etc. Remove the ball grill from the SM58 and it will be more similar to the SM57 in its low frequency response.
Any other differences you hear between the SM57 and SM58 are likely to be subjective (psycho-acoustic) or due to slight manufacturing differences due to part tolerance
lomky said:this is directly from the Shure website. It's probably where alot of this info is coming from:
The SM58 and the SM57 share the same mic element, the Unidyne III. The only difference between the these two models is the grill design.
The grill design does affect the high frequency response, particularly above 8,000 Hz.
The SM57 grill design allows more proximity effect because the mic diaphragm can be placed closer to the sound source. Proximity effect increases each time the distance from the mic to the source is halved. When a mic is placed very close, it is quite easy to halve the distance: 1 inch to 1/2 inch; 1/2 inch to 1/4 inch; etc. Remove the ball grill from the SM58 and it will be more similar to the SM57 in its low frequency response.
Any other differences you hear between the SM57 and SM58 are likely to be subjective (psycho-acoustic) or due to slight manufacturing differences due to part tolerance

Innovations said:Engage the pad switch on the V93 and it should be safe for the kick. The V93, like the 2003, does not show a bass dropoff in the response chart so it should be good for a kick.