VesuviusJay
Poser Roaster
Who likes or uses mastering plugins such as Izotope's Ozone?
Gidge said:If you are gonna "master" in the same room with the same monitors and the same gear, all you are doing is fixing things you shoulda done right with the mix....the good thing is, you probably have access to the tracks (unlike a mastering engineer) and can go back and fix it......
toadies said:my mixes tend to sound good, i don't have the perfect monitors but i uselly compare them to a commerial song will mixing. So when i work on my budjet mastering i get good results. But believe me if i could afford to go to a mastering house i would be there quick! I seen the results of a raw version to a master version, its AMAZING!
toadies said:that is true, I normally don't consider it mastering, but the band wanted me to do something to it to make it louder and not make it as raw, I gave my best shot on it, after 2-3 hours exprementing with it, i achieve a sound me and the band were impressed with listening to in the car.
Is it quality mastering? no way, but it is sure demo quality, i think beyond that, personally.
dobro said:I've been doing this long enough to know two things about mastering: first, a new set of ears on a project is INVALUABLE, and if those are experienced, intelligent ears, you're in the money. Second, people who have a lot of experience on this board just about all say the same thing: it's really dumb to master your own stuff. I believe 'em.
But I don't have enough money to pay somebody to master for me. So I just get the mixes as good as I can, and then adjust song levels relative to each other on the album. That's as far as I go with 'home mastering'. But another thing I do when I'm still at the recording and arranging and mixing stages is to use similar instruments, similar mics, similar reverbs - it helps to produce an overall sound that tends to hang together all by itself, without any other adjustments.
