We didnt get any protection from the Government in the past and we survived. That must be fact otherwise none of us would be here today if it wasnt true.
Would more of us be here and/or would we have been better off if there was Gov intervention way back in the day? I can only talk for own experiences and it appears that there was 'more' to people in olden days. Where today everybodys a victim, in therapy or suffering from some condition. Back then you 'just got on with it'.
I am going to say, drinking and driving laws. We accept them, but how many people does it save, and many people does it destroy, but this is a preventive law. Everyone accepts it, but unless you actually hurt someone ...
I have never been caught drinking and driving and I don't. But this is a good example of the government "protecting us". After it was first passed, the laws would get more restrictive. Then seat belt laws, then child seat laws, so it becomes a slippery slope. IMO As a matter of fact, many laws, like drug use and prostitution, are laws for what?
To me, laws are to protect property rights, regulate business and for personal safety. Proactive laws, or preventative laws and crime prevention practices are what is large issues in the US.
Crime prevention practices for example, if a cop is in a predominantly black neighborhood and he is trying to make the area safer for the residents there. He sees group of young black men known to participate in criminal activities, he is confident if he pulls them over, something will be amiss. The cop or police department is trying to keep crime down and the neighborhood safer. So he pulls them over for a bogus reason and bam, he is caught in a catch 22. He profiled! How can you do crime prevention without some type of profiling. Was he racist, was targeting, I don't know if he is racists, but he pulled them over for various reason, maybe for the right reason, maybe not. But there is no way to ever know. He is trying to prevent crime.
Which leads to "The Minority Report".
But what laws do we want? Send someone to prison cause he is a junky, a woman wants to sell herself to the highest bidder, a person drinks and drives and nothing happens? To me, this is why every law needs to be thought about and make sure the ramifications are understood. Just like when they were protecting kids from child pornography. If you had a picture of a child nude under an certain age, you went to jail for like 5-10 years (not sure how long). Then a 15 year old kid had a picture of himself on his phone. Well, they didn't convict, but he did go to court (lawyers, court costs) . Same thing where two teenagers, around 15 sent pics of each other.
Hum, didn't mean to write so much, but I think the topic is much deeper than it appears on the surface.