if your looking for a heavy base i use my old bronco rims with the mic pole through the center on top of the base of the stand . it anchors pretty good.
i would change the b-1 though. i owned 2 and moved away. for me too slightly whistley metalic for multipurpose. now a 57 or a at20/20 might be better .
i would do a quick comparison. i cant imagine the converters being that bad if you had your heart set on using that feature. 16 bit out- over 24 bit using existing converter is probablythe reason.
there was a guy on ebay selling knock offs. he bought the material from the same factory as stedman i was told.i got mine a year ago. i compared mine with the one in guitar center and it looked identical. i think it was 20$. the verdict is still out for me. i guess its time to break out the...
i liked the truths next to the krks. the mackies sounded better but not quadroople the price. the behringers are tight sounding. never herd of wharfedales except for a few that had problems.
something about the at822 i likes too. isint that the stereo field recording mic? overall the 414 would be my favorite. the 603 close second. the sm7 was a bit boxy weird . my polk audio computer speakers wouldnt lie!
another thumbs up for the pod. i dont care if the mix engineer has to work a little harder to get it to sit in the mix.its just a stepping stone. once the processors get better it will only get closer and i think its good now. another thing to consider is that amps have been miced up forever...
another vote for the tampa! i dont think its the same design as a dmp3 which i love the sound of also. the tampa i believe is class A with some kinda tube emulation harmonic distortion magic. i got me a 2 . theres money to be made in those mid level pre-s because many like me dont want a low...
dont think shears will do it. maybe if you mark the line to be cut with a sharpie marker pen and lock it down in a vice or similar a sawzall or recipricating saw would cut it. just take you time to get a straight line.if you never cut with one its better to let someone do it for you as it is...
i owned that one for a time but dont have a manual for it. i do remember it being more of a stereo type unit and was kinda hard to adjust for mono use. at the time i was happy to get a alesis 3630 if that tells you anything.
lets see. most studios have them so they cant be that bad.i love the midrange on them. they were designed to act more like a home type stereo speakers . the older versions were tweeked using tissue paper to cut down on the ear fatigue. youll have to learn them but you want several types to...
i put the socket in for easy swap and since my soldering skills arent the best .the heat wont get to the op amp this way. i swapped the tube for a euro tube . it was also suggested to look for old amperex bugle boys and telefunken 12ax7-s. i dont know much about the tube characteristics but i...
if anyone has the time to check out the original roger nichols description of the rane mic pre they would have a different thoughts. i took it as he was having a laugh at throwing in a cheapo unheard of mic pre(spur of the moment) and it sounded good for the application he needed it for...
because in my opinion>the same authorities that tell you the shure 57 is holyer than thou forget to mention you need a 1200$ pre amp to make it sound good,
i have a early version tube mp and it had two of the 5532-s. the opl has a 072 and a 5532. i also burned the units in for quiet a few hours and they got very hot. if youve never soldered its kinda tricky but not too bad . what i did was take the thing completely apart and buy a tiny snipper to...