cephus
Slow Children Playing
Maybe I have been wrong all along.
I have always kept digital recordings as WAVs and only rendering them to MP3 for emailing and iPods, etc. The thinking was that since a WAV file is so much bigger than the MP3s, I assumed that the quality was higher. There was less data compression and less digital artifiacts. I have made the mistake of rendering an MP3, then editing a second of silence of the end and resaving it as an mp3 and it sounds like it was built from legos. Very bad quality.
So, idiot question #1, if I edit an MP3 and resave it as MP3, does it re-render it causing the porr quality?
Idiot question #2, I have a Zoom h4 and have been recording gigs as 44.1 WAVs thinking I was getting the higher quality. Allowing me to edit without overprocessing the recording. i think 96khz is overkill for noisey bar gigs. Should I be doing 48 khz or just saving as MP3?
I have always kept digital recordings as WAVs and only rendering them to MP3 for emailing and iPods, etc. The thinking was that since a WAV file is so much bigger than the MP3s, I assumed that the quality was higher. There was less data compression and less digital artifiacts. I have made the mistake of rendering an MP3, then editing a second of silence of the end and resaving it as an mp3 and it sounds like it was built from legos. Very bad quality.
So, idiot question #1, if I edit an MP3 and resave it as MP3, does it re-render it causing the porr quality?
Idiot question #2, I have a Zoom h4 and have been recording gigs as 44.1 WAVs thinking I was getting the higher quality. Allowing me to edit without overprocessing the recording. i think 96khz is overkill for noisey bar gigs. Should I be doing 48 khz or just saving as MP3?