giraffe
i love negative rep
just for the fun of it, on dog's song i did an experiment.
same eq settings on both songs, same rms (close enough)
this test is with only eq and limiting, all other effects turned off.
with the L1
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=3080
with a free telephone filter from JK with the eq section turned off and getting gain using a slider labeled drive (as in, distortion)
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=3081
this is done with 6db of gain on both accounts
i've been playing with this phone filter a lot recently...... but usually only using like 1 or 2 db of gain reduction, not 6.
i kind of like what it does to the top end.
here, i did the null test for you (and cranked it up a bit)
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=3082
i would assume most of the crap you here is from the phone filter, probably a little is from the L1.
the "peakyness" of it is because the L1 track actually peaks a little higher than the phone track, resulting in slightly less of a null on peaks than there should actually be.
same eq settings on both songs, same rms (close enough)
this test is with only eq and limiting, all other effects turned off.
with the L1
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=3080
with a free telephone filter from JK with the eq section turned off and getting gain using a slider labeled drive (as in, distortion)
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=3081
this is done with 6db of gain on both accounts
i've been playing with this phone filter a lot recently...... but usually only using like 1 or 2 db of gain reduction, not 6.
i kind of like what it does to the top end.
here, i did the null test for you (and cranked it up a bit)
http://www.lightningmp3.com/live/file.php?fid=3082
i would assume most of the crap you here is from the phone filter, probably a little is from the L1.
the "peakyness" of it is because the L1 track actually peaks a little higher than the phone track, resulting in slightly less of a null on peaks than there should actually be.
