
Originally Posted by
Massive Master
Monitoring (and the space, of course) are non-negotiable. Better monitoring makes everything better every single time. It is *the link* to every single decision you make along the entire process.
I get confused on this, though it makes logical sense, the rooms I see of the Beatle sessions control room pictures look like a small crowded area with those large fred flinstone looking Altecs,,,,then as I understand the process they would take that mix and run the reels upstairs to their mastering room, which used a better room with the same speakers....
would that room/s sounded better than the picture presents it?
Obviously they had success in mixing and mastering, but why does it look in the pictures the speakers and room seem less than impressive?
And that Eilish and Brother mix engineer said he didnt do hardly anything to their mixes and they were done in that bedroom with Yamaha H7? or something...cheap...for the 5 grammy project. Not my type music but it sounded very commercial. ..as good as McCartneys new releases in top end studios. Though I dont have a clue what speakers or mix/master rooms they used specifically.
Last edited by CoolCat; 11-25-2020 at 05:52.
if it's not happening in the room, it ain't gonna happen on tape.-H.Gerst
Bookmarks