Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Timeline micro lynx v lynx

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Timeline micro lynx v lynx

    Sign in to disable this ad
    What is the diffrence between the micro lynx and the lynx? i want to sync my tascam msr16 tape to logic with logic as the master. i know i can do this with the micro lynx but can i do it with the lynx?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Wales
    Age
    43
    Posts
    3,397
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 106 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    2215120
    Do you mean the Lynx I or the Lynx II?

    The Lynx I is pretty hardcore - you have to really, really know what you're doing to make them work. I have a pair of them and have never, ever been able to make them sync properly. I think part of the problem is that the MK-I is only able to handle the 37-pin parallel protocol. I eventually gave up and brought a TASCAM sync which can speak the serial protocol used by the TSR-8 (and MSR-16). They make excellent timecode readers/regenerators, though.

    Different ROM versions are able to handle different sets of machines. Interestingly, I have just realised that one of mine does support 'tAS-Sr16' - the other only supports 'tASC-40' 50 and 60. Maybe if I had duplicated the ROM from the more modern unit, I would have been able to get it going...

    Be aware that to drive a machine with a Lynx I, you must construct the necessary control cable. Forget about buying one, it ain't happening - the Lynx uses a weird 3-level 50-pin connector that was a pain to get hold of and even more pain to solder together. Then you must wire it up to the appropriate 37-pin connector. There are different schematics for each machine it can talk to (which includes a number of 1" C-format video machines by the way).

    In truth, I am not 100% sure that you can use a single Lynx to do what you need. They predate MIDI so obviously you'll have to generate a timecode with Logic, and get it to output that on track 16 or 24 or whatever.
    Since it can't accept two timecodes, you will probably need two lynxes - one to track Logic, and the second one to actually drive the deck. They are connected together via an RS422 cable. If you can get Logic to spoof the appropriate commands and send them into the Lynx via some kind of USB-RS422 bridge, you might be able to do it with just one. Do you have the software and hardware to do this?

    Sorry if this comes across as a downer, but I know from bitter experience that the Lynx I is a very tough beast to handle :P

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, USA
    Posts
    8,553
    Thanks
    223
    Thanked 218 Times in 198 Posts
    Rep Power
    3753124
    If I were you, and this is based on personal experience, I'd get a Micro Lynx. The Swiss Army Knife of synchronizers...relatively a cinch to use, very flexible, VERY powerful, VERY well made, and is a sync champion. I should have NEVER tried to cut corners...the bees knees of synchronizers.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Fabricating Timeline Micro Lynx transport cables
    By timkroeger in forum Analog Recording & Mixing - Tape & Gear
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 04-01-2018, 06:51
  2. Just got the Lynx II !!!
    By Rev E in forum Microphones
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: 08-23-2004, 17:15
  3. Lynx One vs Lynx Two
    By ChristopherDawn in forum Digital Recording & Computers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-08-2003, 14:54
  4. Who's using Lynx?
    By OzNimbus in forum Cakewalk / Sonar Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 08:18
  5. Sorry...Lynx one again.
    By PRiZ in forum Digital Recording & Computers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-01-2001, 16:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •