dgatwood
is out. Leave a message.
I've been pondering the problems of mid-side miking. Pretty much anything decent will make you do without lunch for a year, and you're left with a bunch of under-$100 electret condensers that I'd expect to hiss like a rattler protecting its nest, judging from the reviews.
Then the thought of X/Y miking crossed my mind, but there are disadvantages there for solo instruments. Almost every article I've read seems to say that M/S does a better job in those cases because it isn't solely registering the primary sound off-axis like an X/Y cofiguration.
So I was wondering what would happen if someone built a hybrid stereo mic design with three standard cardioid condenser capsules---maybe call it X/Y/Z stereo or something. Two mics point across each other (coincident X/Y) with a third, identical "Z" capsule pointing straight forward. That way you'd get the advantage of M/S in terms of the clarity in the center, while avoiding the nightmares that seem to be inherent in designing a good figure-8 capsule.
You'd still be able to represent it as a M/S signal if desired (M=Z, S=X-Y... or maybe Y-X...), but it seems like it could probably be built for a lot less money than a decent M/S stereo mic. And since everything would be (roughly) coincident, I'd expect excellent mono compatibility.
Has anyone ever tried such a mic arrangement? Did it work? Any thoughts?
Then the thought of X/Y miking crossed my mind, but there are disadvantages there for solo instruments. Almost every article I've read seems to say that M/S does a better job in those cases because it isn't solely registering the primary sound off-axis like an X/Y cofiguration.
So I was wondering what would happen if someone built a hybrid stereo mic design with three standard cardioid condenser capsules---maybe call it X/Y/Z stereo or something. Two mics point across each other (coincident X/Y) with a third, identical "Z" capsule pointing straight forward. That way you'd get the advantage of M/S in terms of the clarity in the center, while avoiding the nightmares that seem to be inherent in designing a good figure-8 capsule.
You'd still be able to represent it as a M/S signal if desired (M=Z, S=X-Y... or maybe Y-X...), but it seems like it could probably be built for a lot less money than a decent M/S stereo mic. And since everything would be (roughly) coincident, I'd expect excellent mono compatibility.
Has anyone ever tried such a mic arrangement? Did it work? Any thoughts?