Schwarzenyaeger
Formerly "Dog-In-Door"
So let's start a discussion!
Mix window vs edit window.
I'm edit window masterrace.
Convince me otherwise!
Mix window vs edit window.
I'm edit window masterrace.
Convince me otherwise!
When I'm consigned to Pro Tools hell I tend to work in the edit window. Fortunately most of the time I get to work in Sony Vegas which, unlike Pro Tools, has efficient and intelligently designed editing behavior.
So let's start a discussion!
Mix window vs edit window.
I'm edit window masterrace.
Convince me otherwise!
+1Dual screen FTW!
Editing is mixing.
It's not pedantry, it's an approach. The point is I use one window because I'm doing one thing. Since that one thing, mixing, includes editing I need the editing functions while I mix, at least until it's nearly done when I could switch to the mix window. It would be inefficient to switch to the mix window just to move a fader and then back to the edit window.
Nah, it's pedantry. You're that guy.
I'm sorry it's news to you, all the same.
Editing is mixing.
"Editing is mixing" is just my approach, not some rule I'm trying to impose on the world.
If that makes me a pedant then so be it.
Sounds like you fellas could use a beer. And two monitors.
Sounds like you fellas could use a beer. And two monitors.
It just wouldn't fit where I mix.
I've heard several experienced people say what I said, that Vegas had great editing behavior. That's significant since Vegas isn't that common.
Editing is mixing.