The Passive Monitor Round-Up
- Thread starter DREAMLABS
- Start date
SonicAlbert
Super-Sonic "Herb" Albert
fernandoesmaron
New member
i am looking for an passive now too but have active 8.2 wharfedales with which i want to use them.
Ok my amp isn´t a good one. An cheap sherwood av receiver ( but with tone direct
) so it should not be to expensive and available in europe. Should also be a good choice with the wharfedales.
yorkville ysm is now my favorite but couldn´t hear them until now. Have to look around here to find them.
Want to buy later an better amp.
What about the passive krk´s ( see one with an aluminium woofer - don´t remember the name ). Which one would be ok for me ?
The little hafler ( don´t need an great woofer ) also but are expensive here in germany.
Ok my amp isn´t a good one. An cheap sherwood av receiver ( but with tone direct
) so it should not be to expensive and available in europe. Should also be a good choice with the wharfedales. yorkville ysm is now my favorite but couldn´t hear them until now. Have to look around here to find them.
Want to buy later an better amp.
What about the passive krk´s ( see one with an aluminium woofer - don´t remember the name ). Which one would be ok for me ?
The little hafler ( don´t need an great woofer ) also but are expensive here in germany.
The Green Hornet
New member
Yo Fernando: [You've exited your Hide-a-way?]I have to go with SonicAl--
I have the KRK 8 passives. You will not that the KRK 8 passive has an 8" woofer--most other budget monitors only have a 6.5" woofer. Believe me, the larger woofer gives you a much better sound.
I had Yorkvilles--a good monitor and I sold mine within a week to a friend who is very happy with them.
I also had Alesis monitors and they don't rate in my book after I made the first switch. Difficult to get good quality in the lower-price range but the KRKs work fine. Of course, if you have a shakey amplifier, well, you need to call Mandrake to magically fix the problem.
MISTERQCUE
Not Just Anutha Brutha
Tannoy Proto J's!!
Significant translation & a superb, flat response over the audio spectrum
make these a fine alternative to the above three you have mentioned!
Street @ $170.00
Significant translation & a superb, flat response over the audio spectrum
make these a fine alternative to the above three you have mentioned!
Street @ $170.00
fernandoesmaron
New member
thanks The Green Hornet
You have KRK ST8´s now ?
Did you sell the yorkvilles while the KRK´s were better ?
ok they go lower but what about the rest - how would you describe the differences ?
Which amp do you use with them ?
Enough questions
You have KRK ST8´s now ?
Did you sell the yorkvilles while the KRK´s were better ?
ok they go lower but what about the rest - how would you describe the differences ?
Which amp do you use with them ?
Enough questions
The Green Hornet
New member
Ola Fernando:
I use the Yamaha AX592 integrated amplifier. It fits the nature of the work I do as it connects two tape decks, a CD player, phono, if needed and I still use the old records for special effects, am/fm if ever needed, and I can mix down to either or both tape decks or from one to the other--it's and amazing little amp. It also supports two sets of speakers: monitors and commercial speakers for listening.
The amp also has a "straight" through feature which cuts-off any coloration from the amp itself if needed.
I put my Yorks up for sale as soon as I plugged in and listened to the KRKs. Mr. Q twice is correctomundo about the Tannoys; they do cost more new methinks. I don't but used gear very often.
Because the KRKs have a larger woofer than the Yorks, as I mentioned 8 inches opposed to 6.5 inches, they give a bigger and rounder sound. The low end on the KRKs is better, as well as the high end. Of course if you go to more money, there are monitors that will blow away the KRKs. For the time being, I can get along with the KRKs.
But, I'm always reading here and listening there and can decide to upgrade anytime.
Ciao,
Green Hornet
I use the Yamaha AX592 integrated amplifier. It fits the nature of the work I do as it connects two tape decks, a CD player, phono, if needed and I still use the old records for special effects, am/fm if ever needed, and I can mix down to either or both tape decks or from one to the other--it's and amazing little amp. It also supports two sets of speakers: monitors and commercial speakers for listening.
The amp also has a "straight" through feature which cuts-off any coloration from the amp itself if needed.
I put my Yorks up for sale as soon as I plugged in and listened to the KRKs. Mr. Q twice is correctomundo about the Tannoys; they do cost more new methinks. I don't but used gear very often.
Because the KRKs have a larger woofer than the Yorks, as I mentioned 8 inches opposed to 6.5 inches, they give a bigger and rounder sound. The low end on the KRKs is better, as well as the high end. Of course if you go to more money, there are monitors that will blow away the KRKs. For the time being, I can get along with the KRKs.
But, I'm always reading here and listening there and can decide to upgrade anytime.
Ciao,
Green Hornet
SonicAlbert
Super-Sonic "Herb" Albert
My brother has the KRK ST8's. He uses a Mackie power amp with them, I forget which. Maybe the 1400. I've listened to his ST8's and think they are an excellent value for $250. They sound good, pretty flat and un-hyped. I liked them.
I've since bought a pair of the KRK V4's, which I am totally happy with as my second set of monitors. I use Mackie HR824's as my main monitors.
I've since bought a pair of the KRK V4's, which I am totally happy with as my second set of monitors. I use Mackie HR824's as my main monitors.
fernandoesmaron
New member
CoolCat
Well-known member
mel torme
good read.
another benefit to the aluminum cone per my physicshead friend is this Aluminum material won't "change" over time in comparison to a Kevlar weave which will loosen over time. (no data on how long it takes to loosen? 50years? depends on the weave) as the article said it's stiffer. not saying other parts won't relax overtime. He said theoretically Aluminums great stuff and would be his top choice.
design=materials and physics.
Aluminum cones.
fyi, he just bought a 4" sub woofer for his Home theatre.... but he said "it has a 4" throw where most speakers are <1"!!!" "it moves a bunch of air!!!"
but being 4" the magnet can respond extremely fast making it a very tight bass..instead of flabby!!!"
its not an aluminum cone??
he was quite excited on this new technology.
fernandoesmaron said:
good read.
another benefit to the aluminum cone per my physicshead friend is this Aluminum material won't "change" over time in comparison to a Kevlar weave which will loosen over time. (no data on how long it takes to loosen? 50years? depends on the weave) as the article said it's stiffer. not saying other parts won't relax overtime. He said theoretically Aluminums great stuff and would be his top choice.
design=materials and physics.
Aluminum cones.
fyi, he just bought a 4" sub woofer for his Home theatre.... but he said "it has a 4" throw where most speakers are <1"!!!" "it moves a bunch of air!!!"
but being 4" the magnet can respond extremely fast making it a very tight bass..instead of flabby!!!"
its not an aluminum cone??
he was quite excited on this new technology.
TamaSabian
Peruvian skin beater
MISTERQCUE said:
Yep you should add them to your list.
