![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Compression
Should I use a dbx 266 in my input chain or should I just use plugins after it's recorded. Tell me what do you all think.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Most people like using as little effects/dynamic processing as they can on the way in so they have a clean signal to work with and try things on. I'd use a limiter on the way in just to prevent any clips and then experiment with compression after it's on tape.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Go in clean, and do your processing later. In some cases you might want some light compression going in, like on a bass or a vocalist who has a wide dynamic range. But if possible, don't use the 266 on the input chain.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kind of a loaded question as most compressor plug ins totally suck... but the DBX 266 may be one of the worlds most rancid sounding pieces of shit... is there a "none of the above" option?
__________________
Fletcher Mercenary Audio mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33 We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
come on there has to be some other compressors besides buttfucktry that you like in the plug-in world.....
__________________
"...if the opposite of pro is a con lets go beyond this, the opposite of CONgress must be PROgress..." Cage |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Given my preference, I would have about 6 vintage dbx 160's in my drive rack. Alas, I am stuck with three 266's. As stated, definitely not what you would want to use for a final recording! For home demo's, they work well.
As stated earlier though, good advice is to record as much as you can without any outboard processing at all.
__________________
If it doesn't work - scream, curse, cry, and whine profusely. Just don't let the wife see it! |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|