Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Cakewalk / Sonar Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Cakewalk Cakewalk News Cakewalk Medias Cakewalk Tests Cakewalk Articles Cakewalk User Reviews Cakewalk Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2003
Taiyed Taiyed is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
Taiyed is on a distinguished road
Kinda odd question

I was wondering about this and maybe someone could get an answer for me. Here's the scenario: I use Sonar XL. I loop my guitar parts. Let's say I record one loop and save it. Then I record another loop immeadietly after (which would be the part that follows the previous loop's part in the song), using the same everything and save that. I import loop 1 to track 1 and then copy and paste it to track 2 .004 seconds later. I pan track 1 90% left and track 2 90% right. Then I import loop 2 to track 3 so the end of the above tracks will transition into the start of loop 2 and copy and paste it to track 4 .004 seconds later. I pan track 3 90% left and track 4 90% right. Tracks 1, 2, 3 and 4 are all at the same volume. Now if all of this is so, then shouldn't the guitar parts pretty much sound the same when part 1 transitions into part 2? But, instead on my computer and on my recordings you can clearly differentiate between the guitar parts because they have a distinctly different sound! To me, this makes no sense. I was thinking perhaps it is my sound card? I have an SM57 mic with fine cables and a fine guitar rig. So is Sonar maybe reading the data differently when it's copied and then pasted? Because i noticed the parts sound pretty much sounded the same and transition well when they are in mono. But it seems once i seperate the them, pan them opposite directions and move the one slightly forward, that's when the trouble begins. If anyone knows why this is, it would be great to know. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-29-2003
AlChuck's Avatar
AlChuck AlChuck is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Mateo, CA, USA
Posts: 5,084
Rep Power: 18110
AlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond repute
Wow, what a strange way of working.

When you record the original loops, are they on other tracks in the same project? When you copy and paste them into other tracks, are you then not muting or archiving the original loop clips? This could cause some comb filtering effects which might range from a phasy, nasal quality to a noticeable dimunition of the sound where the loop overlaps with its copy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-29-2003
Taiyed Taiyed is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
Taiyed is on a distinguished road
hehe

well i forgot to mention that i record the loops in a seperate program and then import them into sonar...why i don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-29-2003
AlChuck's Avatar
AlChuck AlChuck is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Mateo, CA, USA
Posts: 5,084
Rep Power: 18110
AlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond repute
Well, then I have not the foggiest idea of what you are doing that might cause this. I can't understand the working method you are using either. I suspect it has something to do with that, but it beats the hell out of me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2003
moskus's Avatar
moskus moskus is offline
The Creator of Æ, Ø and Å
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 6,480
Rep Power: 2459
moskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond reputemoskus has a reputation beyond repute
Wouldn't that create a insanely weird flanging effect?

And I need to ask: What good will come of this method?
__________________
Two wrongs don't make a right, but two Wrights once made an airplane...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:35.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.