Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Alesis Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Alesis Alesis News Alesis Medias Alesis Tests Alesis Articles Alesis User Reviews Alesis Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2003
werewolf831 werewolf831 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Age: 34
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 0
werewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these parts
16 bit ADAT tape soundng better than 20 bit tape?

I've had to use a 16 bit adat tape recently, and it seems to me that when I mix down to a wav file, the mixes made from the 16 bit tapes sound a little better than the 20 bit. I can especially hear this in the cymbals, they seem more clear and realistic. I'm wondering if my setup has anything to do with this. I record on an LX20 and use a Mackie 1604vlz. I mixdown to my computer soundcard (audiophile 24/96) rca line in from the rca tape out on the back of my mixer.
I'm wondering if by going from a 20 bit tape to a 16 bit wav file, I'm losing some sound quality, and maybe my signal is more pristine with the 16 bit tape. Could somebody tell me if this is possible? Or maybe I'm just hearing things.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-14-2003
Track Rat's Avatar
Track Rat Track Rat is offline
Total Gear Slut
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ballwin, Mo. USA
Age: 52
Posts: 10,941
Rep Power: 137582
Track Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond repute
You're doing an analog mix down. You're probably hearing the "rounding off " of the mix from the analog mixer and whatever character the A/D converters in the soundcard imparts. That's the main reason I mix that way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2003
werewolf831 werewolf831 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Age: 34
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 0
werewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these parts
"That's the main reason I mix that way."

I'm not following you Track Rat. Is it bad for the "rounding off" to occur? What kind of tapes are you using, 20 bit or 16?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2003
Track Rat's Avatar
Track Rat Track Rat is offline
Total Gear Slut
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ballwin, Mo. USA
Age: 52
Posts: 10,941
Rep Power: 137582
Track Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond repute
I think the rouding off is a good thing in my opinion. It can kind of "pull" a mix together.
By the way, when I use ADATs it's 20 bit/ 44.1k.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2003
werewolf831 werewolf831 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Age: 34
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 0
werewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these parts
Don't you think that can be done in the mixdown though? Are you concerned with any loss of sound quality?
thanks TR
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2003
werewolf831 werewolf831 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Age: 34
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 0
werewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these parts
whoa, I just noticed something about your post. I though all Adat tapes were pre formatted to 48 k?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2003
Track Rat's Avatar
Track Rat Track Rat is offline
Total Gear Slut
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ballwin, Mo. USA
Age: 52
Posts: 10,941
Rep Power: 137582
Track Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond repute
ADAT tapes that I use don't come preformated (S-VHS tapes like Quantigy, HHB, etc).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2003
sweetnubs's Avatar
sweetnubs sweetnubs is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
Rep Power: 2088
sweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond repute
don't use preformatted tapes for your ADAT's. You want the tape to be formatted by the machine it is going to be played back in for optimum signalation integrityation. thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2003
werewolf831 werewolf831 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Age: 34
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 0
werewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these parts
Ok, but can a tape you format on your machine be played on any other machine? And also, any particular reason to record at 44.1k as opposed to 48?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2003
sweetnubs's Avatar
sweetnubs sweetnubs is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
Rep Power: 2088
sweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond repute
sure you can play tape on any machine regardless of which one formatted it. You get better quality playing the particular tape formatted on a particular machine. If you are mixing analog I'd record at 48k, If you are mixing digitally i'd go with 44.1 so you don't have to resample/truncate from 48k to 44.1, unless you are mixing to analog then i'd go with 48k. hello to you, does this make sense?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-16-2003
werewolf831 werewolf831 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Age: 34
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 0
werewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these parts
Makes more sense. Thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-16-2003
sweetnubs's Avatar
sweetnubs sweetnubs is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
Rep Power: 2088
sweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond reputesweetnubs has a reputation beyond repute
let me clarify my last post a little since I reread and it seems a little confusing. If you are using an analog mixer go 48k regardless if your two track deck is digital or analog. If you are using a digital mixer/DAW and transfering tracks digitally and mixing down to a digital deck through digital connections, i.e. the chain is entirely digital, then go 44.1 to avoid resampling/truncation. If you are mixing digitally but your mixdown deck is analog then go 48k. dig?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-16-2003
werewolf831 werewolf831 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Age: 34
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 0
werewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these partswerewolf831 is infamous around these parts
I'm mixing with an external mixer, mixing to my pc through the rca jacks, so I suppose I am mixing in analog. All my adat tapes are at 48khz, so guess I'm doing all right there. Your second post made even more sense, much thanks. I'll be recording for the next couple days now...using 20 bit tapes. Although that 16 bit tape was sounding damn good after mixdown...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:01.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.