Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Mixing / Mastering


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2003
toadies toadies is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Age: 26
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 8
toadies is on a distinguished road
figureing out a my ideal studio setup.

Right now i have the digi001.

I am mixing in protools, which i get good results i would say, but i would like to mix with my hand and get a feel of what i am doing.

Here is what i was thinking of doing.

buying the alesis AI-3 8 I/O via lightpipe. which would get me a total of 16 channels. I would probably get a good world clock to help sync them better.

I would like to get the SoundCraft Ghost 24. Which has line input plus pre-amps for tracking and mixing. Where do you people uselly send the mix too? I have a 16bit DAT machine i would guess i could send it too.

Also I could use the plugins in protools while mixing analog right? or would that be even worth doing.

Would this be worth my while to get better sound. btw i'm still learning how to mix, but I personally think i'm doing a good job at it, so do my clients.

Am I dreaming to much?
__________________
I own a studio I owe money on.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-2003
Track Rat's Avatar
Track Rat Track Rat is offline
Total Gear Slut
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ballwin, Mo. USA
Age: 52
Posts: 10,941
Rep Power: 137582
Track Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond repute
Mr Toad, sorry i haven't gotten back with you yet. Personally, I like your idea. It's my bet that you'll like the way it sounds. The Ghost is a dandy console. I'm using a MOTU 2408 and an HD24 pretty much the same way. I'm using Cakewalk9 with a mixture of plug ins and hardware simultainiuosly. the advantages in my opinion are obvious, it sounds better and it's VERY flexible. The down side is repeatability of a mix. You can still take advantage of software automation but you still have non automated analog faders and EQ. Still, it's what I prefere.
This picture is kind of screwed up, things have changed a bit but you get the general idea
Attached Images
File Type: jpg new console.jpg (49.7 KB, 110 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-09-2003
toadies toadies is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Age: 26
Posts: 249
Rep Power: 8
toadies is on a distinguished road
what kind of board are you using?
__________________
I own a studio I owe money on.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-09-2003
Track Rat's Avatar
Track Rat Track Rat is offline
Total Gear Slut
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ballwin, Mo. USA
Age: 52
Posts: 10,941
Rep Power: 137582
Track Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond repute
Right now it's a Studiomaster. That'll be changing soon.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2003
Roker1's Avatar
Roker1 Roker1 is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 409
Rep Power: 8
Roker1 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by Track Rat
You can still take advantage of software automation but you still have non automated analog faders and EQ.
Do you find you need EQ automated very often...I was just curious how much people do use automation on EQ...to get special sound effects maybe??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2003
cominginsecond's Avatar
cominginsecond cominginsecond is offline
Decentralized Media Mogul
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boise, Idaho
Age: 33
Posts: 2,030
Rep Power: 1698
cominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond reputecominginsecond has a reputation beyond repute
I've never automated EQ. I guess I never really automated any effects, really. The only thing I automate are volume, pan, aux send volume, and aux send pan. There are very, very limited circumstances I can think of where it might make sense to automate EQ. It might make sense if you need to increase the high end on something when there's 15 other tracks playing so that it sticks out, and then decrease it again when it's soloed.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.