Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Roland, Boss, VS Series Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Roland boss Roland boss News Roland boss Medias Roland boss Tests Roland boss Articles Roland boss User Reviews Roland boss Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2003
Bob C Bob C is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 0
Bob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond repute
Any tips for recording vocals with Boss BR-532?

I just got this machine. So far, for the vocals I've only used the built in mic. They sound surprisingly good, although a bit thin and distant.

Obviously, a better mic would help. Would an SM58, or something in that price range make a considerable improvement? What does anyone else out there use?

Any suggestions on tweaking the algorhythms? I edited insert effect U01 (compressor),adding "doubl'n" and a slight delay at around 160 (milliseconds?). I think you can only use one modulation effect at a time. Is that right?

I've added reverb on the loop effects too. All of this helped, but the vocals don't have the presence that my guitar and bass tracks have. Mic proximity wasn't the answer either.

This is my first song with this machine, and it sounds pretty good. But I know the unit is capable of more - without making it into an over-proccessed mess.

Thanks,

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2003
72fender's Avatar
72fender 72fender is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 346
Rep Power: 5111
72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute72fender has a reputation beyond repute
Lightbulb

I have a BR-8 and use a Roland DR-10 mic. The DR-10 was designed to be use with the COSM mic patches.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2003
Richard Monroe Richard Monroe is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Framingham, Mass. (near Boston)
Age: 55
Posts: 5,460
Rep Power: 808501
Richard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond repute
I like AKG D690 (discontinued but still around cheap) and D770. There are some vocalists that don't sound good through a 58, and I'm one of them. In a perfect world, SM7B, which isn't that much cheaper than your recorder.-Richie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2003
Bob C Bob C is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 0
Bob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond repute
Richard,

Good point. I don't want to spend more than the cost of the recorder. Also, an SM58 isn't really a recording mic - just an example of a common mic in an affordable price range.

72fender,

I've seen the Roland mic in the catalog. Is it a condenser mic? Is it low impedance? How does it sound, compared to the built in mic on the unit (Does the BR-8 have that feature?)?

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2003
Richard Monroe Richard Monroe is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Framingham, Mass. (near Boston)
Age: 55
Posts: 5,460
Rep Power: 808501
Richard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond repute
Well Bob, I have to beg to differ on SM 58. 57's and 58's have been used on more recordings in the last 30 years than any other mic, including some big budget productions. I don't happen to use them for vocals myself, but they may very well be the #1 recording mic of all time. Try this- go look at the equipment list of some big time pro studios. When you find one that doesn't have an SM57 or SM58, let me know.-Richie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2003
Bob C Bob C is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 0
Bob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond reputeBob C has a reputation beyond repute
Richard,

I think you're probably right - especially about 57s.

I seem to remember reading that a 58 is designed for live use. I honestly don't know how often they are used for vocals in the studio.

Anyway, my main question is: How big an improvement is a plug-in mic over the built-in one on the BR-532?

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2003
Richard Monroe Richard Monroe is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Framingham, Mass. (near Boston)
Age: 55
Posts: 5,460
Rep Power: 808501
Richard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond repute
I'm assuming the mic in your Br-532 is an omni electret, not unlike the one in my PXR4 Pandora. If it follows suit, the biggest advantage of an outboard mic is the ambient (room) noise it won't pick up.-Richie
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2003
BHead BHead is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: ClutchCity, TX
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 9
BHead is on a distinguished road
Bob,

I own a BR-8 and it doesn't have the built-in mic feature. And the Roland mic that 72fender mentioned is a dynamic mic, not a condenser.

Anyway, let me guestimate the answer to your question. Since the BR-532 (as well as the BR-8) is a low-priced digital recorder, the built-in features are relatively lower quality. Just like my BR-8, the mic-pre is kind of noisy and weak. Plus, a built-in mic of any kind, I guess, would pick up a lot of noise that is generated from the operation of the machine itself.

By all means (put money into consideration, though :P ), get a plug-in. And 57 or 58 is the way to go for a first mic!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-15-2003
Richard Monroe Richard Monroe is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Framingham, Mass. (near Boston)
Age: 55
Posts: 5,460
Rep Power: 808501
Richard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond repute
Well, the machine makes no noise, so as long as you don't handle it or move faders, etc., the built in mic won't pick up the machine. The advantage of an outboard mic is that you can move and position it. You can do close mic'ing on guitar cabs, etc. It's simply more versatile. For remote recording,(only personal use, not commercial) I use a cheap Behringer mixer and a pair of Oktava MC012's. The mixer gives them phantom power (sort of) and I can use the line outs on the mixer to the stereo jack in on the PXR4, and it actually makes surpriseingly good recordings of almost anything. Everything, including the mixer (MXB1002) runs on batteries in a pinch, and the whole studio fits in a good sized briefcase.-Richie
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-16-2003
gdw gdw is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
gdw is on a distinguished road
I am also a BR532 - Interested in Mics

I am a BR532 user and have had a problem with the quality of the vocal recordings. I've been told there's too much modulation in the vocals. I use a Shure BG 5.1 condensor mic that is battery powered. I was wondering if a mic pre-amp might improve things. Any recommendations? Below is a link where you can hear some of my stuff. Thanks.

www.mp3.com/gary_d__ward
__________________
A day late and a dollar short
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-16-2003
Richard Monroe Richard Monroe is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Framingham, Mass. (near Boston)
Age: 55
Posts: 5,460
Rep Power: 808501
Richard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond repute
Try a really good dynamic. For cheap, I'm a fan of the discontinued, but still available AKG D690. For pricey, it's hard to beat a Shure SM7 or SM7B.-Richie
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:20.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.