Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Newbies


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2002
JesusFreak's Avatar
JesusFreak JesusFreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 0
JesusFreak has a little shameless behaviour in the past
16 bit VS. 24 bit

Hi Gang,

Got a question...I have the Korg D1600 and it is capable of recording in both 16 and 24 bit modes uncompressed. Since they are both uncompressed, is there really going to be THAT much of a difference in sound quality on my recordings??

I tried the search and it didn't accept 24 as a searchable string.

Thanks all.

God Bless!
__________________
Unsure about your future??

Jesus is the answer!!

Ask me how.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2002
BrettB's Avatar
BrettB BrettB is offline
1K Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Belgium
Age: 28
Posts: 1,483
Rep Power: 1595
BrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond reputeBrettB has a reputation beyond repute
The topic has been discussed many times over here, maybe you can search on bit or bitrate?

Off course 24 bit is theoretically beter, because you got a more accurate digital sample. 24 bit has other disadvantages, it needs lots of memory and some machines have difficulties with that, so you have to make up for yourself if the difference in quality is worth the hassle. I think it depends on what your using your recordings for: If there just for you or as demo job it is maybe more easy to go for the 16 bit, but if you really want to come ut with your recordings you can think about recording at 24 bit.

I davise you just try the two, and compare. Then you can hear the difference.
__________________
www.protoolsforum.com

The board for all Pro Tools (LE) users!! Finally back online.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2002
cordura21's Avatar
cordura21 cordura21 is offline
370HSSV- 0773H
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Argentina
Age: 38
Posts: 805
Rep Power: 8
cordura21 is on a distinguished road
yes it's been discussed many times. Many great recordings are in 16 bits.
My advice is to try to record with 16, cause that will force you to learn how to adjust your gain structure the best way. Then go up to 24 and compare.

Cheers, Andrés
__________________
"A woman in a bicycle, with a straw hat, is the most flagrant violation of the laws of aerodynamics." (Dr. Vaporeso)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2002
microchip microchip is offline
From the depths of space
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Florida
Age: 35
Posts: 203
Rep Power: 9
microchip is on a distinguished road
I will admit that I have noticed a positive difference using 24 bit, but the use of memory is probably equally as increased.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-20-2002
JesusFreak's Avatar
JesusFreak JesusFreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 0
JesusFreak has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Thanks for the responses guys...I do appreciate it...sorry I didn't find a previous thread with this..will try again...and will probably try to start in 16 bit so I can compare like you all suggested.

Thanks again.

God Bless!
__________________
Unsure about your future??

Jesus is the answer!!

Ask me how.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2002
macroman macroman is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0
macroman is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb

I have used the Korg D1600 and 24 bit definately sounds much better.

A good benchmark is to record at a lower volume level and compare the 2 sounds. You will definately here a difference here. This is a practical situation as well since you don't compress everything going down to tape and you can't expect to get hot levels across the board.

One thing to keep in mind about recording 24 bit on the Korg D1600 is that you only get 8 tracks. With 16 bit you get all 16 tracks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2002
JesusFreak's Avatar
JesusFreak JesusFreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 0
JesusFreak has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Hello Macroman,

I had read about the 16 vs 8 track deal when recording in 24 bit but if the clarity and quality is that much better, I think I will do it anyway....plus, since there is the ability to bounce tracks to one track, I dont' think that the going from 16 to 8 tracks with be that big of a deal anyway....I hope...

If you can think of any other things I'm not thinking of with this...please let me know...thanks..

God Bless!
__________________
Unsure about your future??

Jesus is the answer!!

Ask me how.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 15:28.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.