Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Mixing / Mastering


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-10-2002
laptoppop's Avatar
laptoppop laptoppop is offline
Musical Technogeek
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 629
Rep Power: 8
laptoppop is on a distinguished road
Best way to convert from 48K to 44.1?

There's GOT to be a better way!

Right now I'm working on a big project which was tracked at 24-bit, 48Khz. I'm mixing it down in Cakewalk Pro Audio 9. I'm then exporting the wave file. I then convert it to 16-bit 44.1 Khz using N-Track.

I'm satisfied with the quality of the conversion (and I'm real picky), but the time involved is killing me. N-Track takes about 7 minutes on my machine (1.6 Ghz P4) to convert a 3.5 minute song.

Is there a better way? Are there any good freeware programs out there that could help (my budget is toast right now)?

Thanks,
-lee-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2002
TexRoadkill's Avatar
TexRoadkill TexRoadkill is offline
Audio Bum
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 38
Posts: 8,864
Rep Power: 125327
TexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond repute
Just to clarify, the problem is the processing time?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2002
laptoppop's Avatar
laptoppop laptoppop is offline
Musical Technogeek
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 629
Rep Power: 8
laptoppop is on a distinguished road
Right - the primary problem is processing time.

The ideal solution would be something that could do a bunch of files at once very quickly.

The next to ideal solution would be something that could do one at a time very quickly.

The still-much-better-than-now would be a batch process that would run slowly (but I could go to bed and let it run).

Right now, I have a slow process that only accepts one file at a time.

-lee-
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2002
RWhite's Avatar
RWhite RWhite is offline
1K Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
Age: 50
Posts: 1,755
Rep Power: 380832
RWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond repute
Don't really have an answer, rather I have a similar situation. I do projects in Cakewalk 9 @ 24 bit 44.1. My hardware will handle up to 48 but I have not found the hassle Vs quality difference to be worth it. I then export to a stereo file, then use Sound Forge 5 to convert from 24 to 16 bit. Sound Forge does have an optional batch file processor that can be downloaded (by registered owners) for doing unattended conversions of large numbers of files. But I don't do enough work to make that necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2002
chessrock's Avatar
chessrock chessrock is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 39
Posts: 11,863
Rep Power: 0
chessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up I have the solution . . .

Just record everything at 44.1 to start with.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2002
TexRoadkill's Avatar
TexRoadkill TexRoadkill is offline
Audio Bum
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 38
Posts: 8,864
Rep Power: 125327
TexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond reputeTexRoadkill has a reputation beyond repute
One thing to consider is that all sample rate conversions are not the same. There are good and crappy convertor algorythms. I sure wouldn't want to ruin weeks worth of work just to save a few minutes of file conversion.

CoolEditPro does do batch file conversions but it's not free. Is there a software soup kitchen in your town
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2002
Sangram's Avatar
Sangram Sangram is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mumbai, India
Age: 37
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 9
Sangram is on a distinguished road
Try Soundengine. you'll find it at Software Music Machine (www.hitsquad.com/smm).

Oh, and let me know how it is, please. I use it for my own stuff because I have to record at 48 because the stupid Soundblaster hardware converter craps out my system. But I can't make out the difference in encoding times, really. My system does a 2 minute song in about 30 seconds, SoundEngine takes maybe 20 seconds but that's about the difference.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2002
Alchemist3k's Avatar
Alchemist3k Alchemist3k is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Glasgow, UK
Posts: 485
Rep Power: 10
Alchemist3k is on a distinguished road
I record at 24bit 48khz and with dithering on my pc takes about one min to convert a 7 min song using Cubase. Get Wavelab or something and try that.
__________________
Neil
MSN Messenger: jordanneil@hotmail.com
Happy to answer PMs.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2002
laptoppop's Avatar
laptoppop laptoppop is offline
Musical Technogeek
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 629
Rep Power: 8
laptoppop is on a distinguished road
SoundEngine looks very interesting. I'll have to keep trying to work it out -- I downloaded the zip file, but there's no installer. I unzipped everything I could (some files were apparently japanese filenames and would not unzip on my system)into a single directory. The program appears to run, but a lot of functions won't work.

I'd love to get Wavelab or something like that - but the budget says "later".

On the other hand, I found an interesting program last night - ssrc from http://shibatch.sourceforge.net/ that looks like it will work for me. Its a command line utility. There is apparently a GUI frontend available, but I have not been successful yet in downloading it. However, I'm fine with command line stuff.

It appeared to work great - one bug, I can't use "gaussian" noise distribution - but other than that, it converted 9 sound files (about 40 minutes worth) in about 4 minutes, and the output sounds good.

Thanks for the help everyone!
-lee-
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:28.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.