Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Mixing / Mastering


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2002
Aren Aren is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Age: 29
Posts: 416
Rep Power: 9
Aren is on a distinguished road
Digital Recording - Analog Mixdown

Hi,

Does it make any sence to anyone to record to a computer, and then mixdown to a reel-to-teel deck (with actual mixing done on the computer, or using and external mixer), then transfering the mix back to the computer for final editing and burning to a CD?
Would the multiple A/D-D/A conversions totally ruin whatever I gained by mixing down to tape?
I'm asking because I might get my hands on a reel-to-reel machine (haven't examined it yet, so I'd like to know what I'm getting into before I start inspecting...)

Thanks,

Oren
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2002
knownuttin knownuttin is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: dallas
Posts: 529
Rep Power: 988
knownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond repute
Aren, I'm sure I speak for most of us when I say the answer is maybe. Very personal decision. Sometimes the trade-off of a bit of degradation from an extra cycle of conversion is worth it for the sound you get from that analog stage. The reality is that tape does still sound better, even if it's noisier.

When you say reel-to-reel, you don't specify multi-track, stereo or ? How old is it and how well was it maintained? How prepared are you to keep up the maintenance? What's the quality and how good a deal are you getting? These are rhetoricals, but you can tell us if you like.

If it's a multi-track in good shape and you're getting a deal, it might be worth it to have for tracking basics, say drums, bass, and guitar, then transferring that to your computer for vocals and other super clean overdubs in digital land.
-kent
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2002
Seanmorse79's Avatar
Seanmorse79 Seanmorse79 is offline
Ghetto Flabulous
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Detroit
Age: 37
Posts: 1,249
Rep Power: 266
Seanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond reputeSeanmorse79 has a reputation beyond repute
Yup - I'd agree with Kent. A lot of studios use tape for drums because of the warmth, then digital for the rest. It's also not uncommon to mixdown to a tape, then back in for the CD's. Just make sure it's a quality machine and that you're using it properly (just a little bit of tape overdrive can really give a mix some energy).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2002
John Byrne John Byrne is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 0
John Byrne is on a distinguished road
A good site to read.

http://www.johnvestman.com/analog.htm

Regards,

John
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-17-2002
Aren Aren is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Age: 29
Posts: 416
Rep Power: 9
Aren is on a distinguished road
Thanks for all the info!

John - That was a really interesting article. The writer seems biased a little, but it was interesting none the less.

Kent - I was referring to a 1/4" 2-track, that I can get for practically nothing. I don't really know what brand, or how good it is. I still have to check it out.

Oren
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-17-2002
knownuttin knownuttin is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: dallas
Posts: 529
Rep Power: 988
knownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond reputeknownuttin has a reputation beyond repute
Practically nothing sounds like a good price! Since there's very little risk for you, by all means take it and experiment. If it's in decent shape you may find that you prefer mixes that have been flown out to tape before bringing them back to digital for a CD. I can almost guarantee that, assuming proper gain staging is observed in the transfer, you will prefer the sound of playback from the tape to the CD.
-kent
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-17-2002
UberGawkman UberGawkman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 10
UberGawkman is on a distinguished road
I was considering doing this exact same thing.... especially since we would have to convert a sample rate from 48 to 44... might as well mix down to analog tape, then back into the computer at 44 and get a little "warmth". We'll just have to see how it sounds...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-18-2002
RWhite's Avatar
RWhite RWhite is offline
1K Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI, USA
Age: 50
Posts: 1,755
Rep Power: 380832
RWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond reputeRWhite has a reputation beyond repute
Unless you have a great tape deck, I would think not. Personally I would rather record origianl tracks on tape, then mix to digital. But I record a lot of loud rock'n'roll and I find it's easier to deal with a little tape saturation on the original tracks. I think once something is digital, it should stay that way. Right now I'm doing 100% digital because my tape deck (Fostex A-8) is no longer what I would consider worthy.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-18-2002
Whoopysnorp's Avatar
Whoopysnorp Whoopysnorp is offline
Huh huh..."member"
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chi-town
Age: 28
Posts: 980
Rep Power: 6696
Whoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond reputeWhoopysnorp has a reputation beyond repute
I've heard that a good way to get some tape saturation is to do what Aren describes, and then record the analog mixdown digitally and mix it with the digital mixdown. Analog and digital side by side, and you can control the levels of each. Seems like a great idea. Haven't tried it, though.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-18-2002
Aren Aren is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Age: 29
Posts: 416
Rep Power: 9
Aren is on a distinguished road
Whoopysnorp - That does sound like a great idea! I would really like to try it out...
I did check out the tape deck today, and it's in pretty awfull condition. I am going to check for how much I can fix it, and then I may be able to do some experiments.

Oren
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-18-2002
chessrock's Avatar
chessrock chessrock is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 39
Posts: 11,863
Rep Power: 0
chessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by RWhite
Personally I would rather record origianl tracks on tape, then mix to digital.
That's the way most of the big-name engineer/producers that we idolize are doing it.

Even though it's only two tracks, think about it: you can still record, say, guitar and bass on to reel-to-reel as well as any one-track overdubs. Route and record another signal direct to digital . . . convert your analog signal to digital later on and compare the two versions of the track, making sure they line up, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 16:46.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.