![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aphex Aural Exciter
I know it "excites the audio," hence the name, but how does it do this? Does it run the signal through a tube? EQ?
What does it sound good on? What does it sound like, period? Thanks guys, Darth |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you, MONTE.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Monte,
Just to clarify, this text in that article is wrong: " ... in an attempt to realign the relative timing of low-, mid- and high-frequency components in a complex sound." That's just a load of BS intended to hide the fact that they are really adding distortion, and/or high-frequency EQ, and/or high-frequency compression. --Ethan |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone else?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ethan,
Dude your entitled to your opinion and you obviously don't like these devices. But that statement is not (as you say) BS. I don't want to get into tech wars here, but if you take a dual trace scope and compare input to output while running a sweep generator through a BBE device that is EXACTLY what it does (among other things). Besides, I just thought it might be good reading for someone like Darth who was interested in how the things work. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Whatever you do, don't get your Aural and Anal mixed up. That would be messy.
Fangar |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Monte,
> you obviously don't like these devices. < That's not really true. I don't use them, but I'm not an "exciter basher" like some, and they probably do have their place. I might even use one someday if I thought a track would benefit from that particular effect. But I object when a manufacturer uses techno-gobbledegook to pretend their product does something it doesn't, or vice versa. > if you take a dual trace scope and compare input to output while running a sweep generator through a BBE device that is EXACTLY what it does (among other things). < A lot of things can alter how the input and output look on a 'scope. But the notion that audio needs to be time-aligned to match the loudspeaker is ridiculous. How could one compensation work for my JBLs, and someone else's Mackies, and a consumer's Radio Shack speakers all at the same time? And shifting phase a few degrees is not audible anyway. Why doesn't BBE just tell the truth about what the Sonic Maximizer really does? > Besides, I just thought it might be good reading for someone like Darth who was interested in how the things work. < No problem there, and the rest of that article does seem useful. --Ethan |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Aphex "ANAL "Exciter
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Music for psychopaths by psychopaths |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Aphex "ANAL "Exciter
Quote:
![]() Fangar |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|