Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Cakewalk / Sonar Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Cakewalk Cakewalk News Cakewalk Medias Cakewalk Tests Cakewalk Articles Cakewalk User Reviews Cakewalk Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2002
phosphor phosphor is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
phosphor is on a distinguished road
Recording and mixing levels

Hi,
Cakewalk and I are starting to get along better these days - thanks in particular to this site. I'm starting to work on my mixing abilities, and I would like a few pointers here.

I record each track seperately (bass, guitar, voice etc) ensuring that the windows mixer levels are adjusted so the record level for that particular track in cakewalk console view stays out of the orange area (and doesnt trigger the red light)

When mixing I get the volume sliders how I like, but I constantly find the Main meters go into the red (and I sometimes can hear pops when it does). Only by reducing each track down do I get it so the main meter level never goes red. Problem is when I export and convert to mp3 the sound levels are very low compared to other mp3s that I have.

Am I missing something?

I use a sennheiser e845S mic straight into my SBLive.

(perhaps not the greatest description - what other details can I provide?)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2002
AlChuck's Avatar
AlChuck AlChuck is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Mateo, CA, USA
Posts: 5,084
Rep Power: 18110
AlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond reputeAlChuck has a reputation beyond repute
See this recent thread...

http://homerecording.com/bbs/showthr...threadid=45057
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2002
phosphor phosphor is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
phosphor is on a distinguished road
interesting article. I dont find the clipping a problem, I've already been lowering the levels on tracks in my mix to avoid it - and using the reduce by 3db feature on areas of a track that may have a kick or a whack (ie too loud, sounding out of place with the rest of the track).

My problem is that my mix (with carefully adjusted volume sliders in the console view to get it as loud as possible without clipping) is always very quiet when compared to other mp3s/cd tracks.

Is this a mixing problem or a recording problem? I know i'll get inferior results with my mic straight into my SBLive, is this an example?

Thanks for the advise AlChuck, much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2002
postalblue's Avatar
postalblue postalblue is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brazil
Posts: 592
Rep Power: 9
postalblue is on a distinguished road
that's a mastering problem, i mean, a problem to be solved during mastering. assuming you're recording signals that are as hot as possible without clipping, and you're mixing down with the main busses at 0db. you can get the extra volume during the mastering stage, but if what you're getting is REALLY quiet when compared to commercial cds, then there might be something else wrong, i guess.

adriano
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2002
phosphor phosphor is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
phosphor is on a distinguished road
mastering you say... interesting.

Your correct in that I push the recording signals as high as I can get without clipping, but could you explain (for the newbie that I am) what you mean about mixing with the main busses at 0db.

I've heard people talking about this in another thread - does it mean that you leave the sliders up at 0db in the console view of cwpa?


thanks for your help people!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2002
postalblue's Avatar
postalblue postalblue is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brazil
Posts: 592
Rep Power: 9
postalblue is on a distinguished road
I've heard people talking about this in another thread - does it mean that you leave the sliders up at 0db in the console view of cwpa?

yup, but not the track sliders. the main busses are the ones to the right of the track sliders.

adriano
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2002
crosstudio's Avatar
crosstudio crosstudio is offline
Reggae + Go-Go = Regg'go
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: bowie, md
Posts: 1,734
Rep Power: 2663
crosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond reputecrosstudio has a reputation beyond repute
Here is my long-winded opinion:

there's a difference between the peak level of a sound and the average level of a sound. While you are tracking you are ensuring that the peak level of your sound stays out of the red.

then while mixing you try to get all your tracks to blend well without having a digital over in the main outs.

if you set your cakewalk tracks so that playback shows both peak and rms, you'll see a big difference between the peak level and average (Root Square Mean) level of your sound.

average level is the level of the "perceived sound you hear with your ears". peak level is what causes digital overs.

MAKING THE MIX HOTTER:
compress the individual tracks (as necessary) to get the average level of the track closer to the peak level. if you are applying EQ to a track to remove a large section of frequencies (ie.. high pass filter or low pass filter) put the EQ before the compressor. If you are using EQ to scoop out a particular frequency so that some other instrument sits better in the mix, put the EQ after the compressor.

[That last statement about where to put your EQ/Compressor in the chain was pure Crosstudio and you can take it or leave it. Up until 2 months ago, I always put the EQ after the Compressor, till i figured out that it's stupid to have my compressor working hard on frequencies that I don't want to show up in the mix anyway.]

MAKING THE MASTER HOTTER:
use a multi-band compressor [like the Waves C4] and a look ahead peak limiter (like the Waves L1 or DSP-FX optimizer] as necessary during mastering. The multi-band compressor can help tame (the peak/rms level thing again) frequency sections:

low: bass/kick
low-mid & mid: guitar, snare, male vocal
high-mid: female vocal, synth pads, and such
high: cymbals and such

The look ahead peak limiter should be used to cut off the really quick peaky transients that made it through the compressors but don't add any quality to the sound. don't set the limiter too low or you will cut off the transients that do add quality to the sound.

be very careful with the multi-band compressor and peak limiters during mastering. if you are over-agressive with them, you will make a beautiful song sound like hot crap. the levels will be plenty hot, and the sound will be plenty crap.

I am finding that the more attention to detail I pay to the way i play, and the way I compress/eq the individual tracks... the less i need the multi-band compressor. but i still always need the peak limiter because the really quick transients still drive down the average level of the sound. on tape units those really quick transients provide saturation. on digital they provide clicks and pops.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2002
Paul881's Avatar
Paul881 Paul881 is offline
Look Mom, I can play!
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Englands Rose of the Shires
Posts: 1,598
Rep Power: 467773
Paul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond reputePaul881 has a reputation beyond repute
Besides the great reply Crosstudio has just posted, read some of the articles in ProRec, here's one:

http://prorec.com/prorec/articles.ns...2566B9001EF763

BTW, it is not a good idea to use the + or - 3db tool in CW. It is a destructive effect. By reducing and then taking it back up again, it looses adio integrity. Same as Normalisation, to be avoided wherever possible.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.