Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Analog Only


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Recorder-multitrack Recorder-multitrack News Recorder-multitrack Medias Recorder-multitrack Tests Recorder-multitrack Articles Recorder-multitrack User Reviews Recorder-multitrack Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-31-2009
Victory Pete's Avatar
Victory Pete Victory Pete is online now
Thinking outside the box
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 561
Rep Power: 465529
Victory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond repute
Question Synchronizer head wear?

I just got a Tascam MTS-1000. I have a few Tascam machines I might want to synchronize. Here is the question: Are the tape lifters bypassed on both machines while they are locked up? That would mean while the transports are FF and RWing the heads are getting a nice polish. I would be hesitant to do alot of unnecassary synchronizing.
VP
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2009
jpmorris's Avatar
jpmorris jpmorris is offline
Tape Wolf
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Age: 33
Posts: 1,370
Rep Power: 31235
jpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond repute
If they are, it's gone wrong. The ATS-500 does not need to do this.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2009
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
Shouldn't most tape sync systems rely on the transport's tape counter for the sync during fast forward and rewind operations?

Then I suppose that once you begin normal playback it will lock up more directly by reading the timecode on the tape itself. Is that correct?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2009
sweetbeats's Avatar
sweetbeats sweetbeats is offline
Reel deep thoughts...
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 2,979
Rep Power: 246082
sweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond repute
In fast wind the synchronizer should be relying on tach pulses, not sync tone. Obviously while the transport is scrubbing the lifters should be retracted and the synchronizer should be "listening" to the sync code on tape, but once the transport reaches a certain speed in fast wind the lifters should extend and the synchronizer should be relying on tach pulses to get to a general location and then zero in using the sync code on tape once the lifters retract.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2009
Victory Pete's Avatar
Victory Pete Victory Pete is online now
Thinking outside the box
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 561
Rep Power: 465529
Victory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond reputeVictory Pete has a reputation beyond repute
Well that is good to know, I thought the machines always needed the sync tone to follow each other. So they read the counter roller to get to a general location and then the sync tone makes the adjustments for lockup?
VP
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2009
jpmorris's Avatar
jpmorris jpmorris is offline
Tape Wolf
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Age: 33
Posts: 1,370
Rep Power: 31235
jpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victory Pete View Post
Well that is good to know, I thought the machines always needed the sync tone to follow each other. So they read the counter roller to get to a general location and then the sync tone makes the adjustments for lockup?VP
Yes. Having said that, I have heard that some 24-track machines have wide-band amp cards available for the last track so that they can pass the code to the synchroniszer in full wind mode, but I imagine that they probably use the induced audio from the lifted tape rather than actual full-head contact during wind as that would kill the heads pretty quickly.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anybody have/know of a Tascam ES-50 Synchronizer For Sale? sweetbeats Analog Only 3 08-14-2009 15:09
Fostex 4030 Synchronizer analog aaron Analog Only 14 10-21-2008 19:17
head wear question Peck Analog Only 4 08-15-2006 17:21
Brain Wave Synchronizer woodman Cool Edit Pro / Adobe Audition Forum 14 12-07-2004 21:55
JLcooper pps-2 synchronizer carey Recording Techniques 0 11-30-2001 17:13


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:37.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.