Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > The Rack


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Studio-effect Studio-effect News Studio-effect Medias Studio-effect Tests Studio-effect Articles Studio-effect User Reviews Studio-effect Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2009
hexagramer hexagramer is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
hexagramer is on a distinguished road
New DIGI 003 RETURN BOGLER

HI!

ok i just bought a digi 003 rack, the new one with 4 mic pre's and 4 jack in's, with more than 8 outputs.

now i used to run my studio with a projectmix and iv done cd's here - myspace.com/producernickcasey

but i sold all that up and decided to buy a digi003 rack unit in the hope that it would add more depth and clarity to my music. i havent recorded anything or anyone in a seriouse session, but! i brought my hard drive with old recrdings and bought a behringer sfx2442 to bring out seperate channels back into the desk, and use the desk's outputs to go back into the digi003's 8 inputs, as returns.

so, when i done this i was quite dissapointed at the incapabilities of this interface. i routed my outs into seperate channels on the desk and iv gotten an AMAZING sound with the little effects etc. this was all good...but heres my problem: the digi003 cant exactly capture the desk's performance when i route the signal back into LE.

was i expecting too much off my rack? or is there something im doing wrong? the decibel level and loudness and intensity isnt the same.

was i very off in buying this 003? had i fooled myself into thinking i could have gotten a HD sound?
nick
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2009
iownrocknroll iownrocknroll is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 297
Rep Power: 63294
iownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond reputeiownrocknroll has a reputation beyond repute
Why would you be going out of the Digi 003 into a berhinger anything?

I could see on the way IN for extra pres.

but for "fx" I can't imagine is sounding good.

The 003 has line ins and outs, not inserts.

it's a great "recorder" when used like one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2009
Richard Monroe Richard Monroe is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Framingham, Mass. (near Boston)
Age: 55
Posts: 5,466
Rep Power: 808501
Richard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond repute
I agree. I don't get it. There are better plugin FX in ProTools than anything you are going to get out of a Behringer box. All you are doing is lengthening your signal chain and degrading your signal.-Richie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2009
oretez oretez is offline
Hwy 50
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 175
Rep Power: 86615
oretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond reputeoretez has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by hexagramer View Post
HI!

ok i just bought a digi 003 rack, the new one with 4 mic pre's and 4 jack in's, with more than 8 outputs.

[snip]
decided to buy a digi003 rack unit in the hope that it would add more depth and clarity to my music. [snip]

had i fooled myself into thinking i could have gotten a HD sound?
nick
don't know what an 'HD' sound might be so can't respond to that in any way

reality is though that the best 'depth and clarity' any recording is going to have is in the initial capture. One can run it around the block and make it jump through hoops and in the process achieve, create, commit great art but you are not going to increase 'depth and clarity' ('clarity might or might not have some objective reference but if depth refers to anything but bit depth that is entirely subjective and virtually impossible for someone you are not copying point to point to suggest how you might achieve)

the 003 is probably a step up from the project mix (depending on how dependent you were on flying faders) but side stepping issues of content and performance for the moment, generally speaking 'depth and clarity' (in my guesstimate as to what depth might be) are functions of room and mic placement, followed by mic selection, followed distantly by mic pre's with converters (certainly at this price point) a long long way down the list

in my experience very little that falls in the fx column should ever be expected to improve depth and clarity a lot of fx were developed initially to deal with issues arising from room and mic issues: you got eight tracks printed to tape and 'oops' . . . $4k/day to retrack or let's try this! (a little ingenuity and wire) . . . or you can pay for a 60X75X20 no parallel surfaces room with hardwood floors and modes 'treated' or you can record in a closet and deal with inevitable 'issues' with a little ingenuity and wire

pretty soon the ingenuity and wire becomes conventional wisdom

main point here is what was the initial goal: where you trying to remix previous sessions? If so new hardward converters are the least of your concers . . . theoretically (given the range of readily available gear today) the goal of converters should be transparency . . . not 'color' (i.e. not 'impoved' depth (and improving 'clarity' is pretty much out of the running without retracking in any case) and it is possible, baring certainly possible grotesque interconnect issues, that is exactly what the 003 has delivered
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Digi 003 Console drewbonez Free Ads for Music / Recording Equipment 0 03-24-2009 02:14
WTB. Digi 003 jarrydee Free Ads for Music / Recording Equipment 0 01-26-2009 14:27
Distortion on digi 003 Erockrazor Pro Tools Forum 1 12-23-2008 01:47
Digi 003 NIB earthboundrec Free Ads for Music / Recording Equipment 4 04-02-2007 22:56
all these years for this! Digi 003 TragikRemix The Rack 6 03-15-2007 16:38


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:13.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.