Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Analog Only


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Recorder-multitrack Recorder-multitrack News Recorder-multitrack Medias Recorder-multitrack Tests Recorder-multitrack Articles Recorder-multitrack User Reviews Recorder-multitrack Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2009
jjones1700's Avatar
jjones1700 jjones1700 is offline
Learning, always learning
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 737
Rep Power: 251468
jjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond repute
Headphone output on Tascam 122b

This isn't a major issue as it doesn't affect the output to tape, but I'm just curious what might be wrong.

When I playback on the 122b deck and listen with the headphones, there is an awful lot of hiss. I listened to the tape I recently recorded with it on my MR-2 deck and all sounds good, so it's just the headphone preamp portion I'm assuming. Any solutions/suggestions? Should I even bother? I noticed that when I changed the belts not too long ago that there were some discolored sections on one of the boards. Perhaps this is the effect from that?
__________________
<insert witty and more appropriate comment here>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2009
Dr ZEE's Avatar
Dr ZEE Dr ZEE is offline
Anti-Pro Circles Insider
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,601
Rep Power: 205929
Dr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjones1700 View Post
... it's just the headphone preamp portion I'm assuming?
- Headphone power amp IC, that is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjones1700 View Post
Any solutions/suggestions?
-To ignore it if you can, or to replace the headphone amp circuit with something different, if you feel like DIYing some

As I recall, evm1024 has done something about it (on tascam 32???), or at least was working on it. Or am I wrong?
__________________
Dr ZEE
MZE | ZDL | DZW
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-16-2009
Jidis Jidis is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
Jidis is on a distinguished road
JJones-

Yes, it's noisy as crap.

If it's the same as mine (original 122/dual speed) the hiss is so bad that I looked up the amp chip to see if it could be swapped or something, but I don't have time to mess with it now. I think there's another old Tascam here which is just as noisy (Porta Two maybe), but IIRC, my newer 122mkII was much cleaner there. I guess they figured nobody would care about the quality of the phone signal.

I'm with Dr. Zee's suggestion. I think these things may have been made back before all the cheap dedicated amp chips showed up. If you were really careful about the current and voltage matching, you may be able to stick something like an LM386 circuit in place of it. Of course there's always the possibility that the signal feeding that amp circuit is just noisy to begin with.

Take Care,

George
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2009
jjones1700's Avatar
jjones1700 jjones1700 is offline
Learning, always learning
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 737
Rep Power: 251468
jjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks for the info. It's not a big issue, it just caught me off guard when I actually tried to monitor through the deck instead of the mixer. As long as the main I/O is unaffected, I can live with the noisy headphone amp circuit. One of these days I'll get around to snapping up a mkII or mkIII so I can have built-in dbx.
__________________
<insert witty and more appropriate comment here>
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2009
sweetbeats's Avatar
sweetbeats sweetbeats is offline
Reel deep thoughts...
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 2,968
Rep Power: 246082
sweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond repute
I thought the mkII's were Dolby B/C/HXPRO decks...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2009
Jidis Jidis is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
Jidis is on a distinguished road
Indeed they were (at least up to the mkII). There's a Teac here which does dbx (435X), but only regular speed and there may be others, but an outboard 224X is just about as cheap. I just won a second one on eBay for $22.50 (for a 4-track machine). I think the heads or circuitry may have improved slightly after that original 122/122B though. I remember the high frequency limits were a bit lower on the old one unless you ran high speed. - this is judging by Tascam's specs.

Take Care

George

PS- Keep in mind every single thing from back then will probably have trouble in 2009 unless it's been serviced over the past few years. I've got five of theirs sitting here now and not a single one is running properly. It's all just the usual rubber crap though and I should have my belt order put together over the next day. Just be careful and figure that into the cost if you don't like going inside them yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2009
jjones1700's Avatar
jjones1700 jjones1700 is offline
Learning, always learning
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 737
Rep Power: 251468
jjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond reputejjones1700 has a reputation beyond repute
Sweet, you might be right. I'm guessing as to which one had the dbx built-in. I could have sworn at least one of them had it. Then again, I keep forgetting about the dbx 224x units. I need to keep an eye out for one of those.

As for the limited range on the first gen 122, I honestly couldn't tell you. I haven't put it through it's paces just yet. I replaced the belts not too long ago and haven't had much time to work with it since then. Something about having to go to work and paying bills. I hate that. Don't you?

I'm here to learn from you guys.
__________________
<insert witty and more appropriate comment here>
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-17-2009
sweetbeats's Avatar
sweetbeats sweetbeats is offline
Reel deep thoughts...
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 2,968
Rep Power: 246082
sweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond repute
According to the manual for the 122mkIII and the 112mkII, both those decks were Dolby B/C/HXPro decks and single speed at 1 7/8ips. Was one of the 100-series decks hi-speed? i.e.:

Quote:
I remember the high frequency limits were a bit lower on the old one unless you ran high speed. - this is judging by Tascam's specs.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-17-2009
Jidis Jidis is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
Jidis is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetbeats View Post
Was one of the 100-series decks hi-speed?
Yes, the "old" 122 that he and I have. I think the 122b is the same but with balanced XLRs on the back along with the RCA jacks. There's a sister deck under the Teac name called a C1 which looks just like it (actually there were two colors of that), but it looks like it only did regular speed.

JJones, in the 122/122mkII specs, it looks like for CrO2 tapes they have the 122 listed as 35Hz to 14kHz, while the mkII goes down to 25 and up to 19k. The 122 is supposed to hit 20k on high speed, but then you've got a weird tape that nobody else can play.

BTW- It looks like quite a few of the Teac models from the late 80's or so had dbx. If you ever needed one with that onboard, look around for stuff in the R-400-500 series or D-400-500. Mine is an R-435X. That stuff's nowhere near as heavy or expensive as the rackmount Tascams, but it sounds decent when working properly.

George
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tascam 122B........my new toy jjones1700 Analog Only 29 09-20-2008 21:07
Tascam 388 Stereo Output Issue - No R output edwood83 Analog Only 12 08-05-2008 13:23
Tascam 122b speed problem--need help! RICK FITZPATRICK Analog Only 0 05-29-2008 17:08
Headphone Output TelePaul Guitars and Basses 6 10-15-2007 10:20
US-122 low headphone output? sjino TASCAM User Forum 4 02-05-2004 10:15


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.