Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Analog Only


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Recorder-multitrack Recorder-multitrack News Recorder-multitrack Medias Recorder-multitrack Tests Recorder-multitrack Articles Recorder-multitrack User Reviews Recorder-multitrack Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2008
needledrop needledrop is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 6
needledrop is on a distinguished road
A couple analog questions

Hello All,
Just a couple of questions I've been meaning to ask my well informed brethren.

First, I just bought a couple reels if Ampex 456 unopened, whats the best way to store these reels since I wont be using it for a few months. Also, Is there any way to date a reel?

Secondly, I've been using Rat shack Head cleaner, but its getting harder to find and is kinda expensive. Can I just use isopropyl alcohol, or denatured alcohol instead?
Thanks.

oops, guess thats 3!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2008
Dr ZEE's Avatar
Dr ZEE Dr ZEE is offline
Anti-Pro Circles Insider
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,601
Rep Power: 205929
Dr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond repute
91% Alcohol is an excellent head-cleaner Three bucks purchase at CVS will supply your headcleaning needs for "life" (well, for long time that is)
Link: http://www.cvs.com/CVSApp/cvs/gatewa...=91%25+alcohol

...now there are two
__________________
Dr ZEE
MZE | ZDL | DZW
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-04-2008
jpmorris's Avatar
jpmorris jpmorris is offline
Tape Wolf
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Age: 33
Posts: 1,372
Rep Power: 31235
jpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by needledrop View Post
Hello All,
First, I just bought a couple reels if Ampex 456 unopened, whats the best way to store these reels since I wont be using it for a few months.
In the trash. Um, I mean, find out what year it was made, and then decide. I say this only half in jest - be aware that if it's pre-1995, it is probably best to chuck the tape out and keep the metal reels as it probably has the sticky-shed problem.

Quote:
Also, Is there any way to date a reel?
With Ampex, find the serial number. It's a 5-digit number on the box, e.g. 92070. The first two digits are the year, in this case 1992 (bad).
With Quantegy, the first four digits are the year, e.g. 2002218 (good).

As for proper tape storage, I think it is supposed to be kept in a climate-controlled cupboard. I don't have one of those, though - I just keep them on a shelf in my studio area.
The tape should be put vertically on the shelf like books - if they are laid flat and stacked, you are liable to have edge damage on the bottom side of the tape.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-04-2008
Dr ZEE's Avatar
Dr ZEE Dr ZEE is offline
Anti-Pro Circles Insider
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,601
Rep Power: 205929
Dr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpmorris View Post
.... (bad).
.... (good).

.
Good idea!
Let me add some visuals in a bad-good style
__________________
Dr ZEE
MZE | ZDL | DZW
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2008
Dr ZEE's Avatar
Dr ZEE Dr ZEE is offline
Anti-Pro Circles Insider
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,601
Rep Power: 205929
Dr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond repute
Before storing the tape "PLAY IT BACK" instead of rewinding, to avoid the BAD as shown.
See pictures:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tape_wind_bad.jpg (61.2 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg tape_wind_good.jpg (59.1 KB, 49 views)
__________________
Dr ZEE
MZE | ZDL | DZW
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2008
Dr ZEE's Avatar
Dr ZEE Dr ZEE is offline
Anti-Pro Circles Insider
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 2,601
Rep Power: 205929
Dr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond reputeDr ZEE has a reputation beyond repute
Then put the reel in the plastic bag and in the box and store the boxes like holy books of prophets on the bookshelf (good), but not like a pile of junk-mail under the desk (bad),
and , well, try to avoid magnetic fields and extreme weather as much as possible :
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tape_store_bad.jpg (60.5 KB, 48 views)
File Type: jpg tape_store_good.jpg (59.4 KB, 47 views)
__________________
Dr ZEE
MZE | ZDL | DZW
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2008
sweetbeats's Avatar
sweetbeats sweetbeats is offline
Reel deep thoughts...
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 2,983
Rep Power: 246082
sweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond reputesweetbeats has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
91% Alcohol is an excellent head-cleaner
If you go the isopropyl alcohol route make sure it is "anhydrous" (water-free). It will say "Anhydrous" on the label. If it doesn't, check to see what it says in the ingredients. If it says "inactive ingredients: water" or something like that, don't use it. 99% is even better than the 91%, but it is harder to find and, again, make sure it is water-free.

Beck is a devoted denatured alcohol user for his cleaning needs. All "denatured" means is that it has an ingredient added to make it unfit for human consumption as the alcohol in denatured alcohol is ethyl alcohol, the drinkin' kind. The additive could be isopropyl alcohol, or some other toxic mineral spirits. Beck indicates that denatured alcohol is a better choice over the isopropyl alcohol, and at some point he indicated he was going to post some links to clarify that.

Beck, if you read this, could you get something up about the denatured alcohol? I know I'm still curious about what would be the best to use.

Also, consider using cotton makeup remover pads to clean your heads and tape path. Cjacek got me using them and they work really good. Make sure they are the 100% cotton variety and have sort of a quilted appearance. They hold together better (i.e. lint-free). Much easier to use these than the cotton swabs for cleaning guides and such. Cheaper too.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-04-2008
avieth avieth is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 2271
avieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond repute
Is it really pre 1995 Ampex tapes that are bad?

The first two digits of the serial numbers on my Ampex 457 tapes are all 03, yet they still cover my heads in oxide within 10 minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-04-2008
needledrop needledrop is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 6
needledrop is on a distinguished road
Hmmm. The number is 92, I guess thats bad. Is there any possibility that they may be good?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-04-2008
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is offline
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,246
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by needledrop View Post
The number is 92, I guess thats bad. Is there any possibility that they may be good?
No possibility because all of the bad years, till Quantegy took over, have the crappy binder.

----
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-04-2008
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is offline
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,246
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by avieth View Post
Is it really pre 1995 Ampex tapes that are bad?

The first two digits of the serial numbers on my Ampex 457 tapes are all 03, yet they still cover my heads in oxide within 10 minutes.
What is the entire string of numbers and what is the address on the back of the box?

---
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-05-2008
jpmorris's Avatar
jpmorris jpmorris is offline
Tape Wolf
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wales
Age: 33
Posts: 1,372
Rep Power: 31235
jpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond reputejpmorris has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by needledrop View Post
Hmmm. The number is 92, I guess thats bad. Is there any possibility that they may be good?
I have a couple of pre-1995 tapes that were good last I checked. However, I also have a 1/2" test tape on 406 (IIRC) which coated the machine with white gunk when I tried to play it.
So it seems to be the luck of the draw, but personally I wouldn't want to risk it.

There is also a separate failure mode where the tape doesn't shed at all, yet somehow clings to the transport very slightly, causing it to auto-shut off. I had some 1993 tape do that when testing a new machine that I didn't trust with masters yet.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-05-2008
avieth avieth is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 2271
avieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond reputeavieth has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjacek View Post
What is the entire string of numbers and what is the address on the back of the box?

---
There is a label on the cellophane wrapper reading:

AMP 1/4-457-7" TT
*Prices..*
# 000071 03A8-31

From 401 Broadway. Redwood City, CA. 94063
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-05-2008
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is offline
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,246
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by avieth View Post
There is a label on the cellophane wrapper reading:

AMP 1/4-457-7" TT
*Prices..*
# 000071 03A8-31

From 401 Broadway. Redwood City, CA. 94063
Redwood City. That's pre Quantegy. Your tape has the bad binder. I personally wouldn't use it. If the address was Opelika, Alabama then that's the good stuff.

----
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-05-2008
needledrop needledrop is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 6
needledrop is on a distinguished road
ok this one says

456-17311J 92012

and another says

456-17311J 2001044
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-05-2008
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is offline
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,246
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by needledrop View Post
ok this one says

456-17311J 92012
Manufactured on the 12th day of 1992 - BAD
Quote:
and another says

456-17311J 2001044
Manufactured on the 44th day of 2001 - GOOD

---
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noob-- have a couple question about analog??? JusBeCuzz Newbies 2 04-12-2008 23:54
Just a couple of questions whenwatercomes Newbies 9 08-12-2006 13:22
A couple questions antispatula Mixing / Mastering 5 12-05-2005 21:35
A couple of questions. Microfiction Digital Recording & Computers 13 02-23-2004 01:08
a couple of questions Chain Smoker Newbies 3 01-30-2003 01:08


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 14:12.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.