Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Newbies


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2008
fattmudge fattmudge is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
fattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond repute
changing bit rate after tracking

I accidentally recorded my tracks in 16 bit instead of 24. I have the option to change the bit rate to 24, but is that the same as recording in 24 bit?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2008
bennychico11's Avatar
bennychico11 bennychico11 is offline
...
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 4,530
Rep Power: 78547
bennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond repute
first, it's bit depth. bit rate is something different.

and no. You can't gain bit resolution that's not there. Converting it to 24 will give you a 24 bit file, but with a lot of useless, blank information to give you those extra 8 bits. Those extra bits won't do anything but give you a bigger file size though.

There's nothing wrong with your 16 bit file though. Don't worry too much about it as long as it sounds good to your ears.
__________________
www.redlabaudio.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2008
fattmudge fattmudge is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
fattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond reputefattmudge has a reputation beyond repute
cool... thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-08-2008
Massive Master's Avatar
Massive Master Massive Master is offline
MASSIVE Mastering, LLC
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago area, probably looking for more coffee.
Age: 42
Posts: 5,385
Rep Power: 1294717
Massive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond repute
If nothing else, (A) you can record any additional tracks in 24-bit. 16 & 24's can live together just fine as long as they're all the same sample rate and (B) your software is very likely throwing calculations in 32 bit float. Still, 24 bit for next time. But not the end of the world.
__________________
John Scrip - MASSIVE Mastering


Spoon-feed a newbie the answer and he'll mix for a day --
Spark his curiosity to find the answer himself and he'll mix for a lifetime...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2008
suprstar's Avatar
suprstar suprstar is offline
it aint ez bein' green...
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beer City
Age: 37
Posts: 1,169
Rep Power: 6514541
suprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond reputesuprstar has a reputation beyond repute
What they said ^^^^^. It's like taking a thumbnail of an image, and blowing it up. It gets pixelly and blocky and blurry. You'll be getting the audio equivalent of that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2008
bennychico11's Avatar
bennychico11 bennychico11 is offline
...
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 4,530
Rep Power: 78547
bennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond reputebennychico11 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by suprstar View Post
What they said ^^^^^. It's like taking a thumbnail of an image, and blowing it up. It gets pixelly and blocky and blurry. You'll be getting the audio equivalent of that.
not quite to that extreme. It's not ruining the quality of his recording...it's just not helping anything. To keep your image analogy, it'd be like taking a picture that was taken on a camera phone...opening it in photoshop and saving it as a TIFF file in hopes of increasing the image quality. The only thing it will do is make the file size bigger...you'll still have the original quality you started with.
__________________
www.redlabaudio.com
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Changing sampling rate in pro tools? Necromaniac Mixing / Mastering 2 04-14-2007 12:25
Constant bit rate or Variable bit rate mp3 encoding? mbouteneff Cakewalk / Sonar Forum 4 09-16-2006 20:42
Recording at 24/96K vs. 16/44.1?? WERNER 1 Recording Techniques 88 06-02-2006 20:24
When to Dither?.. please help Enzo66 Recording Techniques 10 02-28-2006 12:03
bit vs sample rate ohthatguy Other Equipment and Reviews 1 08-09-2004 23:40


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:26.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.