Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Analog Only


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Recorder-multitrack Recorder-multitrack News Recorder-multitrack Medias Recorder-multitrack Tests Recorder-multitrack Articles Recorder-multitrack User Reviews Recorder-multitrack Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2007
pentatonik pentatonik is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Marseilles, France
Age: 28
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
pentatonik is on a distinguished road
M-30 vs. M-208, what should I choose? (can't afford both)

hi there folks,

sorry to go again with that question.
I actually did some thread research on this forum, and found usefull information about mixers and so on (thx to all contributors!), but I also noticed that "what mixer should I use with..." questions are coming back again and again... (specially with my beloved TSR-8, dont ask why!!)
Unfortunately, I am now in such an emergency that I have to post this question again.


I am currently facing a double purchase opportunity (don't even think of stealing it from me: it's on the french market ) at the very same price, and I have to make a choice:

TASCAM M-30 or TASCAM M-208?
I own a TSR-8.
I'd like to be able to record both 8track-at-once and 4track-at-once.

What I already know (or think I do):
both of these mixers are 8/4/2 (I mean 8 mono ins, 4 busses, 2 mains).
So 8track-at-once would be with Direct Outs (or inserts) and 4track-at-once
from busses (submixes).
both of these mixers are NOT "B" versions, so no phantom.

First question:
I found that from cjacek: it is the M-30 if I'm right.
8 outs to the 8 tracks recorders? Is that 8 independant outs at once, or the 1-5, 2-6, 3-7, 4-8 thing (which I never figured out)?
I though the M-30 is 4 busses only? Are they stereo busses?

Second question:
Which one is smaller and lighter? the 208, I guess?
(I'd need flexibility and compacity)

Third question:
Something I don't get: why the hell does the 208 have 14 faders (8 ins, 4 busses and 2 mains, with differents colors, so teaching, so transparent, even Marty McFly could understand that) while the 30 has only 10 faders (8ins, 2 mains)? Are his busses controled by faders?

Fourth question:
Well, which one should I choose after all?

Last edited by pentatonik; 11-14-2007 at 08:20.. Reason: misspelling
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2007
pentatonik pentatonik is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Marseilles, France
Age: 28
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
pentatonik is on a distinguished road
can't edit twice?

Fifth question:
Do they both have direct outs (where? postEQ? postFAD? switchable?) as well as inserts (where? preEQ? switchable?)?

thanks
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2007
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is offline
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,239
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
pentatonik: I believe the TSR-8 was originally paired up with the TSR-8 but at the same time the M-30 is no slouch either. BOTH will give you what you need, ability to record 4 - 8 tracks at once. I have no experience with the M-208 though but Beck does (with his TSR-8) and I'm sure he'll chime in soon.

My general recommendation would be to get the mixer which is in the BEST overall condition. Is this a local pickup or shipping? Again, both of the mixers enable you to do what you want so pick on condition.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-15-2007
pentatonik pentatonik is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Marseilles, France
Age: 28
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
pentatonik is on a distinguished road
thanks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjacek View Post
pentatonik: I believe the TSR-8 was originally paired up with the TSR-8
guess you mean "with the M-208"? or maybe 308?

both are local pickup...
but I won't be the one to pick it up (a friend will).
both seem in good condition.
I lied, there's a slight difference in price (100 vs. 120€, both cheap for me, but huge difference with your crappy dollars ).

what about compacity / usability?
14 x 60mm faders (208) vs. 10 x 100mm faders + 4 knobs for busses (30) ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2007
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is offline
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,239
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by pentatonik View Post
thanks!
guess you mean "with the M-208"? or maybe 308?

both are local pickup...
but I won't be the one to pick it up (a friend will).
both seem in good condition.
I lied, there's a slight difference in price (100 vs. 120€, both cheap for me, but huge difference with your crappy dollars ).

what about compacity / usability?
14 x 60mm faders (208) vs. 10 x 100mm faders + 4 knobs for busses (30) ?
Oh man, sorry, I did mean paired up with the 208 originally. Sorry, I've been having a mighty stressful time lately...

BTW, sorry to not have answered your written out questions but I'm unsure about several of them and don't want to make an error..

The M30 doesn't have 100 mm faders.

I don't have the specs on the M208 but I know the M30 is like 30 - 35 lbs, quite heavy for a small / mid size mixer. Have you downloaded the M30 manual, I had uploaded recently?
http://homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=251739

It has a ton of info on the specs and connectivity of the mixer.

I know you said you can afford only one mixer but at that price it's really worth getting the 2. You can always sell the other if you don't like it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2007
pentatonik pentatonik is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Marseilles, France
Age: 28
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0
pentatonik is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjacek View Post
quite heavy for a small / mid size mixer. Have you downloaded the M30 manual, I had uploaded recently?
http://homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=251739

It has a ton of info on the specs and connectivity of the mixer.

I know you said you can afford only one mixer but at that price it's really worth getting the 2. You can always sell the other if you don't like it.
oops. had forgotten about this manual (which I already thanked you for , I should have remembered).
I quickly went through it once again, and:
  • can't believe how teachfull this manual is (chapter about dB, and everything). I'm quite young and astonished about how these guys used to rule... this looks rather like a patient friend explaining stuff than like nowadays' trade!!
  • the M-30 seems much more complete! more routing possibilities... sweepable mids... DirectOuts which the 208 doesn't have... even PHONO ins...

Well... I'm currently building a preference for the M-30...
What about the sound, anyone? preamps and EQ: are they equals on 30 and 208?
Maybe more important: considering that 30 is older stuff, am I facing a risk of deterioration of the parts which could alleviate sound quality?

(I know I said both are local pickups, but... I don't have the opportunity to test these machines. Even if I had, am not sure I could ear it - and I won't go inside the machine to change parts, I'm afraid - at least for now that I'm still a newbie.)

Last edited by pentatonik; 11-16-2007 at 03:00.. Reason: misspelling
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2007
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 485676
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
I have the M-216 and M-208.

The M-30 and M-208 are both nice mixers, but I would usually go with the M-208 for recording, especially if you will be doing location recording.

The M-208 is newer, smaller, lighter (8.5 kg vs. 16 kg), quieter, and the fader layout is handy for mixing. It also has two Effect/Aux busses and dedicated stereo effect returns. The mid EQ is semi parametric.

The downside is that it has no Buss in for stacking other mixers and no direct outs. However, the lack of direct outs is usually no big deal. Each of the four busses has two RCA outputs for use with an 8-track recorder. This is where the 1-5, 2-6, 3-7, 4-8 thing comes in. Busses 1, 2, 3 and 4 connect to tracks 1, 2, 3 and 4. Busses 1, 2, 3 and 4 also connect to tracks 5, 6, 7 and 8. You can record up to four individual tracks at once through the mixer, so there is no need (for most people) to have direct outs.

The M-30 was designed mainly for recording, but is missing some important features for recording. The M-208 was designed for recording and live sound, so is not optimized for either. I’ve modified my M-208 by putting in newer op-amps and Buss inputs. I also added switches so the effect return can go to Buss 1, 2, 3, and 4, as well as the stereo buss. If I had the M-30 I would have modify it quite a bit. Neither board is perfect as is, but the M-208 gives you more to start with, IMO.

__________________
«:: «::B::» «::E::» «::C::» «::K::» ::»

"Where in the hell are the red M&M's?"
~My Lil' Sister, 1976

Last edited by Beck; 11-16-2007 at 18:28..
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you had to choose just one AllOrNothinEnt Digital Recording & Computers 5 03-14-2004 20:35
Help Me Choose A Mic jskillz89 Microphones 10 11-12-2003 12:39
Which Would You Choose???????? shAkEz_gk Digital Recording & Computers 1 09-27-2003 11:49
What would you choose? SiniS The Rack 14 09-09-2003 19:30
Which monitors do I choose? jayoneill Newbies 11 09-07-2003 18:00


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:26.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.