![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beyer M201 and M201N differences?
what are the differences between these two mics besides the xlr vs tuchel connector.
i can get a pair of M201N for the price of one M201. i heard the M201 is great on snare and guitar cab. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't believe there is any difference outside of the connector which is what the suffix "n" indicates.
__________________
Yeah I'm an attorney, but everyone needs a day job. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually I believe the (C) designation refers to the connector, not the "N". I have a pair of M201N.2 which are the tuchel versions.
One of my favorite mics, without a doubt. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Michael Hartkopf used to have a site that laid out all of the taxonomy, but it seems to have disappeared from the Web. Too bad -- it was a great site. I think you are correct that the N suffix is for the older three pin DIN connector and the NC suffix for XLR. In any event, I don't think there is any audible difference. Of course cables for the N mics will likely be pricier.
I too have a couple of those mics - (NC) now that I've looked -- and they are indeed great mics for all kinds of applications. To the OP, is the mark on the M201, just M201 with no suffix? Edit: OK, here's an authoritative posting by David Satz about mic suffixes: http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/m/114669/0/
__________________
Yeah I'm an attorney, but everyone needs a day job. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|