![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
CPU/Buffer Problem - SX 3 with i88x
This probably has a simple answer, but I'm really new to the DAW world.
The Setup: Athlon XP 2700+ (2.16 ghz) 768 mb RAM Yamaha i88x firewire interface The Problem: There is a huge jump on the CPU processing meter when I change from my soundblaster card to the interface. This seems to only be happening recently. The CPU is fine when I'm in a very small session (i.e. compressing and eqing a 2-track), but in a modest 10-12 track session with 1-3 plugins per track, the CPU is maxed out, even when the playback is stopped. My computer becomes more or less frozen. My latency seems to be a bit lower than usual (~5ms input, ~3 ms output). I haven't tracked recently, so I don't know if the CPU is less stressed with input, rather than output. I could temporarily fix the problem by freezing half of the tracks, but I'd rather not. I know I need to get a better computer, but I think there is something else at play. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Since you've got a limited amount of processing and a less than powerfull processor you should consider your usage of plugins to be a problem. Do you really need 30 plugins running for 10 tracks? NO....
Use Group channels to process multiple tracks with the same plugin; like reverb. Reverb works very well as a group plugin. Compression can also be grouped together in some instances.
__________________
7 times down, 8 times up......
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I already use group channels for reverb, and sometimes compression on drum submixes. My biggest session uses 22 plugins - I'd say about 55% eq, 40% compression, and 5% reverb. It didn't seem like a processing problem a while ago when my latency was a bit higher. And it isn't a problem when running through a soundblaster card. I run sessions at 44.1/24.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
You do change you hardware buffer settings when mixing correct?
If you don't, you should. Mixing should always be done with a higher buffer setting to help reduce CPU crunch. There's really not much need to have low latency when mixing. Track with low-latency buffer settings, mix with high buffer settings. Why do you use a SoundBlaster card anyway? Those things are notorious for causing problems.
__________________
7 times down, 8 times up......
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the tip, that seemed to solve most of the problem. Things are still a bit glitchy when I use the word clock on the i88x as the master clock. I have no clue why.
I use the soundblaster just to check mixes on my comp's speakers. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| rack with legs so i can tilt back | walters | The Rack | 43 | 08-17-2007 20:35 |
| M-Audio Firewire Audiophile, Firefox + Media Player problem?!! | carlosguardia | Digital Recording & Computers | 0 | 03-05-2007 14:35 |
| robot sounding spdif problem | thedude400 | The Rack | 16 | 12-22-2006 10:26 |
| Sonar 4-5 "Random" problem (tough one) | Thrawn | Cakewalk / Sonar Forum | 2 | 08-20-2006 14:18 |
| Unwanted distortion in amp; possible preamp tube problem? | Whoopysnorp | Guitars and Basses | 11 | 09-16-2003 13:06 |