![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Protools hardware - Delta 66 / 1010 / 1010lt/ Fast Track Pro...
Hello.
My first thread on this forum, and here it goes... I have protools, and I was looking at compatible hardware here: http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?...00&itemid=4901 And I must admit that I'm a bit confused after reading a lot of threads on this forum about many of this hardware. I was almost settled for the 1010lt and found out that the preamps were no good, then the delta 66 is not nearly as good as the 1010 (which is too expensive for my budget), the Fast Track Pro has some issues and people don't seem to like it... Now, if I had let's say $300-$400 to spend what would you go for? My bet is Delta 66 with a Yamaha 12/4 mixer???? Best regards and thanks for a good forum. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you get one of these you might be able to do away with the mixer. But it is $100 over your budget.
http://www.zzounds.com/item--MDOFW1814 A lot of people around here use the 66 so you should be able to get plenty of info.
__________________
He who seeks the truth must doubt everything |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks good. You know if the preamps are any good? And if this thing is working properly, being an external firewire card and all?
Otherwise, I noticed that this Protools of mine is useless to me, since it doesn't have the OMF file import/export option. I do mostly sounds for films... So I guess I'll go for Cubase until Protools come to their senses and integrate the OMF file option in their "cheaper" versions. But I noticed there is this ProtoolsLT but then I'm stuck with this Mbox of theirs which to me seems very limited. Maybe somebody might be able to convince me of the contrary. I'm still wondering about what way to go, so if anybody has any suggestions... Maybe Cubase with a Delta 66 and a Yamaha MG 12/4 - or with this M-Audio Firewire 1814??? Best regards. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
i've got a 1010 (rackmount) and let's just say that for a novice recordist who's just starting out, it won't be the worst piece in the chain by a longshot.
in fact, i'd say that the converters in it are rather good--it's the clock that's the weak spot. clocked to my minime, the sound of the 1010 is open, large and smooth. but again, for the novice recordist, i'd doubt that's even going to be noticible--let alone a problem. delta 1010's can be had for $250 and under all day used. i too wouldn't buy one new, but then again i rarely buy anything new. i'd agree that PCI-based gear is "older" in design (compared to PCI-X and firewire), but i can guarantee you that PCI's not going anywhere anytime soon. there's just too much that's been based on it. i mean, how long did ISA hang around after it was effectively "dead"? anyway, i wouldn't worry about buying a piece of PCI-based gear. cheers, wade |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks guys for your input!
I'm still hangin' in there. Depending on my budget and the software road I'm taking. At the end of the day, I guess it's the in the way that you use it... right? ![]() Regards. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Good Guys List | Hard2Hear | Free Ads for Music / Recording Equipment | 866 | 2 Days Ago 11:45 |
| Delta 1010 vs. Delta 1010lt | andycerrone | Newbies | 3 | 02-02-2006 04:25 |
| delta 1010lt with Cool Edit Pro ! | pepe | Cool Edit Pro / Adobe Audition Forum | 1 | 08-23-2005 12:14 |
| Please help compare and define M-Audio 2496 v. Delta 410 v. Delta 44 v. Delta 1010 | danielshawn | Digital Recording & Computers | 6 | 12-31-2003 02:15 |
| your Delta 1010 questions answered | CyanJaguar | Digital Recording & Computers | 1 | 02-23-2001 10:47 |