Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Mixing / Mastering


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2006
iancl iancl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 310
iancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond repute
Publishing online - File conversion

Hey, for saving as an mp3 / m4a-acc / lame mp3, what program should I use to get the best results, no worries about time or anything of course.

I am worried about file size, and will be writing at 128kbps.

Just would like some recommendations on what file type to use and what program.

I've always done mp3's until now, on CDex. But abnormalities in the program have me thinking there must be better ones available.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-25-2006
danny.guitar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by iancl
I've always done mp3's until now, on CDex. But abnormalities in the program have me thinking there must be better ones available.
What abnormalties? I've used CDeX for along time now and no problems.

It's not the program you use, it's the encoder that the program uses. Using the LAME encoder with CDeX, is the same as using LAME with any other program.

I would suggest CDeX using the LAME encoder, at 128KBPS. Although, if you can, I would suggest at least 192KBPS. I notice a huge quality difference between 128 and 192.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2006
Ford Van's Avatar
Ford Van Ford Van is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the act or process of locating
Posts: 2,269
Rep Power: 0
Ford Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond repute
I think the Fraunhofer codec sounds much better at 128kbs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2006
iancl iancl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 310
iancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond repute
by the way, Sorry if I posted this in the wrong section, I didn't really know where to put it!

A second question:
I'm saving as an mp3 from a .wav, but would this give a lower quality result than if I saved directly to an mp3 (I'm using SONAR).

Recording in 16 bit 44.1, and that's the same as the .wav, but I'm thinking with the multiple tracks and the different gains/volumes and whathaveyou, there may be a slight loss of quality?

Any insight would be appreciated!

Thanks,

Ian
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2006
iancl iancl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 310
iancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by danny.guitar
What abnormalties? I've used CDeX for along time now and no problems.

It's not the program you use, it's the encoder that the program uses. Using the LAME encoder with CDeX, is the same as using LAME with any other program.

I would suggest CDeX using the LAME encoder, at 128KBPS. Although, if you can, I would suggest at least 192KBPS. I notice a huge quality difference between 128 and 192.
Thanks for the two replies so far guys, too fast!!!

And yes, I had thought of that, and maybe I was using a crap encoder with it. I just downloaded CDex a long time ago, and have never known if it is meant to be reliable.

Are the LAME and the Fraunhofer both free?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-25-2006
iancl iancl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 310
iancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond reputeiancl has a reputation beyond repute
And I should be able to use the encoder directly from SONAR right?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-25-2006
Ford Van's Avatar
Ford Van Ford Van is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the act or process of locating
Posts: 2,269
Rep Power: 0
Ford Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond reputeFord Van has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by iancl
Are the LAME and the Fraunhofer both free?
Lame is free (I don't like it, so to me, you get what you pay for!), but last I heard, you have to pay for the Fraunhofer codec. Fraunhofer is the company that created mp3's, so really, they have the most experience in this whole thing. I think their codec reflects that.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simple stuff? LP>>>>CD (help the aged) simpleone Newbies 10 01-10-2001 07:49
MIDI file conversion to wav robn Cakewalk / Sonar Forum 1 06-19-2000 11:11
MT200 file conversion tonzer Roland, Boss, VS Series Forum 0 05-14-2000 05:23
Roland MT200 file conversion tonzer MIDI Mania 0 05-14-2000 05:20


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:21.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.