Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > Other Equipment and Reviews


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2006
sathyan sathyan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Columbus OH USA
Age: 32
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 989
sathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond reputesathyan has a reputation beyond repute
Recorder: Fostex MR-8 mkII vs MR-8 HD

I'm trying to decide between the Fostex MR-8 mkII (which uses CF) or the MR-8 HD (which has a 40GB hard drive). I'm interested a portable recording solution for two track recordings - laying down tracks which can be edited later and recording performances of 2 hours. At stereo recording time is not a big deal for me as the HD costs $400 and the mkii $250 I can add 2GB CF cards (3 hours each) for $54 and archive old material. I don't play more than 3 hours at a time.

Am I right to assume the following are the same?
- A/D chip (24-bit Sigma Delta)
- D/A chip for monitoring
- headphone amps
- analogue circuitry
- mic pres
- clean-ness of signal
- software stability

Pluses for the CF model
- can run on batteries
- quieter (no HDD)
- no HD to fail / easy to replace CF cards
- cheaper

Pluses for the HD model
- much more capacity
- Optical out
- twice the inputs

I'm leaning towards the mkII, is there any reason beyond capacity to go for the HD - audio quality I would consider a compelling reason?
Is there another product I should be considering?

thanks
sathyan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-04-2006
junplugged's Avatar
junplugged junplugged is offline
Busy Writing/Producing...
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 2,021
Rep Power: 128000
junplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond reputejunplugged has a reputation beyond repute
i have had errors on cf cards and all flash card types that don't show up until you reach that parrt of the card that has the defect.

almost every card i ever had messed up my data at some point.

one the sd in my digital camera, i don't empty it out so i can work around the spot where 4 pics are not accessible so i never reuse that area.

i think hdd might be more reliable. not that you can't get data loss with them either, but i've had a lot more trouble with flash cards of all types so far.

i even had a messed up MD on a multitrack once.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2006
zacanger's Avatar
zacanger zacanger is offline
of Angry Man Records
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South-Central PA
Age: 20
Posts: 1,364
Rep Power: 165759
zacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond reputezacanger has a reputation beyond repute
I've got the CF version. Definitely go with the HD. You could put out for a larger CF card but that'll cost a bit, and the extra inputs really are neccessary, I hate not having them on mine.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2006
daav's Avatar
daav daav is offline
Flailing up a storm.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,007
Rep Power: 38259
daav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond reputedaav has a reputation beyond repute
Aren't (at least the CF version) 16bit?
I had the original MR-8 CF version and the difference in quality of recordings when i went to a 24 bit comp interface were huge.

Daav
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fostex MR-8 mkII 8-Track Digital Recorder mixer hookup? SMX_Dizzy Recording Techniques 3 08-06-2006 18:46
Fostex R8 Reel to Reel recorder panicscam Analog Only 5 05-10-2003 17:30
Looking for Fostex XR-5 4 track Recorder Manual--- HLO Fostex Forum 0 01-06-2002 14:12
Tascam 414 MKII vs. Fostex x-34 orificium Newbies 0 10-04-2000 13:00
Fostex G16S recorder jeemai Fostex Forum 2 05-13-2000 01:17


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:29.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.