Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > The Rack


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Studio-effect Studio-effect News Studio-effect Medias Studio-effect Tests Studio-effect Articles Studio-effect User Reviews Studio-effect Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2001
jpryor jpryor is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
jpryor is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb

I have a question that is probably two-fold. I'm using several pieces of rackmount gear with my Roland V-Studio. I'm currently connecting everything with 3' unbalanced 1/4" connectors. Would I benefit to upgrade to balanced connectors? If so, which type of connector/cable is better (1/4" TRS or XLR)? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2001
Tom Cram's Avatar
Tom Cram Tom Cram is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 362
Rep Power: 9
Tom Cram is on a distinguished road
Talking

I think you answered your own question in the "what is balanced" thread. I'm not being facetious, just letting you know that you already know.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2001
jpryor jpryor is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
jpryor is on a distinguished road
I suppose I was looking for a more authoritative answer. I know the difference, but I was looking for someone to help me justify the expense of balanced cables. I have a friend whose acquiantance just spent $900 per cable in a new "hi-fi" stereo system. Can the human ear really differentiate good quality cables from super quality cables?

Also, I didn't know if there was an inherent benefit of XLR over 1/4" TRS. I have about 35' of total cable length, but each cable is either 10' or 3'. Would balanced really make a difference?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2001
skippy's Avatar
skippy skippy is offline
1K Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,064
Rep Power: 15
skippy is a glorious beacon of lightskippy is a glorious beacon of lightskippy is a glorious beacon of lightskippy is a glorious beacon of lightskippy is a glorious beacon of light
Hoo boy- you're going to have some fun with this one, then. You've let the is-wire-audible genie out of the bottle again...

Short answer on that part from me: IMNSHO, no. Good cable is good cable, "super cable" is pure hype. Your buddy probably got robbed blind. Do a quick search on the phrase "Monster Cable" on this site, and you'll find all manner of opinions on this topic.

On balanced/unbalanced interconnect: balanced is always preferable, even in line-level situations. The hot setup is to lay in a roll of good shielded pair cable, a boatload of connectors, and make your own interconnect. You can save enough money in this manner to make it an overall savings. If your gear offers balanced interconnect, IMHO you should always make the effort to take advantage of it.

Connector style? 1/4" TRS and phantom power don't mix. TRS plug/jack pairs short tip and ring to sleeve as they are connected and disconnected. XLRs do not exhibit that antisocial behavior. They also have the advantage of connecting ground first, and the signal pair only after ground is contacted as the connection is made, and breaking ground last as the connection is broken: which is general good form. For mic connections in the presence of phantom power, XLRs are the only appropriate connectors.

For line-level (with no phantom power present), it's pretty much a wash. If the equipment has both XLR and TRS jacks for a balanced interconnect, I typically use the XLRs: I believe them to be marginally more reliable. The best-quality line-level patchbays use longframe TRS jacks, and are stone reliable. The little plastic shortframe TRS jacks used on a lot of gear may be significantly less so, *especially* if they see a lot of plug/unplug cycles. Thus my minimal bias towards XLRs when possible. And they latch in place.

And, come to think of it, they're usually easier to solder, and I'm basically lazy... (;-)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2001
The Axis's Avatar
The Axis The Axis is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 486
Rep Power: 3153
The Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond reputeThe Axis has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up

All of Skippy's advice ! Believe it.
Good Luck,
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2001
jpryor jpryor is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
jpryor is on a distinguished road
ok, how about digital

At the risk of open another perverbial can of worms, what about digital connections (AES/EBU and S/PDIF)? Do I need a special "digital" cable to connect S/PDIF compatible RCA I/Os? I've heard increased bandwidth is necessary. Thanks in advance, I'm finding the folks here to be an invaluable resource!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2001
Tom Cram's Avatar
Tom Cram Tom Cram is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 362
Rep Power: 9
Tom Cram is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up

AES/EBU has to be 110 ohm, S/pdif has to be 75 ohm. If you use different ohm cable you will have sync errors.
Disregard all other hype, the ohmage is all that matters. A lot of sales-weasels will try to sell you really nice RCA cable as digital cable, if it's not 75 ohm it won't work right. Video cable is 75 ohm, cheap, readily available, and has gold connectors. I see them sold at Blockbuster, and the like, all the time. These work just as well as $50 digital Monster cable.

Keep your S/pdif cable lengths as short as possible, definitely under 10'. AES/EBU can be longer, I've heard of people using 100', but that's probably pushing it.

Tom Cram
dbx Senior Technical Support
(801) 568-7530
tcram@dbxpro.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2001
John Sayers's Avatar
John Sayers John Sayers is offline
Solar Power!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the rainforest.
Posts: 3,290
Rep Power: 19448
John Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond reputeJohn Sayers has a reputation beyond repute
Hi Tom Cram - nice to see some senior tech support here...we need it
cheers
John
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2001
Tom Cram's Avatar
Tom Cram Tom Cram is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 362
Rep Power: 9
Tom Cram is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the welcome John. I've started surfing and answering questions on a bunch of different bbs's including this one. I'm trying to be proactive. An early post or two on a bbs saves me a lot of phone calls down the road.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 16:01.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.