![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
monitoring
I was mutli-tracking this weekend and noticed that my main meter on the bottom is clipping even though the individual tracks are not. What's up with that, I set the monitoring to smart and external, and everything else. I ran with it, baecause as far as I could tell just as long as the individual channel wasn't clipping on the input, it was fine.
__________________
Omit Peas From the Menu you Pot Bellied, Crazy, Solid Gold Dancer |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
(A) The *individual channels* are probably NOT clipping.
(B) When you add those channels together, you're going to clip. (C) Take it as an omen - It's very likely that you're tracking way, Way, WAY too hot. Channels shouldn't be "not clipping" -- They should be "not even close to being remotely worried about every possibly getting near clipping" -- 0dBVU as a reference - Not -0dBFS. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, thanks. That being said I wasn't really close to clipping at all on the tracks, isn't it better to record that way (as close as you can while avoiding clipping) so that you have a better SNR, and you can bring them down as much as you want in post?
__________________
Omit Peas From the Menu you Pot Bellied, Crazy, Solid Gold Dancer |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nope, not in digital.
Take a look at this thread; it might get you started on understanding why it's better *not* to record hot: http://homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=202058 |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, wow, it's amazing what you don't ever hear. Or at least listen to. Now you said "0dBVU = around -18dBFS" rule of thumb. Now does that mean -18DBFS is what the reading is in the computer?
__________________
Omit Peas From the Menu you Pot Bellied, Crazy, Solid Gold Dancer |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
nevermind I dug around and found the answer. So should I read the main level indicator, or individual tracks? Which one should I take to -18dBFS?
__________________
Omit Peas From the Menu you Pot Bellied, Crazy, Solid Gold Dancer |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
When you're recording, follow that -18 dB guideline for the individual tracks. That'll keep the levels where they ought to be.
When you're mixing, you don't have to be so fussy. The master volume can be set higher, as long as it isn't clipping. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, let me repeat you in a dummy fashioin to make sure I got it. The rule of thumb discussed is only for recording, it's ok to take everything up in post right?
__________________
Omit Peas From the Menu you Pot Bellied, Crazy, Solid Gold Dancer |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wouldn't move the master fader - Just as a matter of course.
You don't have to be *as* fussy, no. But in practice, you should be. Everyone (almost) is going to use up all of their headroom in the mastering phase anyway - Using it up *ONCE* is one thing. Using it up over and over again is another. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, got it, thanks guys
__________________
Omit Peas From the Menu you Pot Bellied, Crazy, Solid Gold Dancer |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| US-122 - Direct Monitoring - I Need Help! | KiFF BluEs | TASCAM User Forum | 13 | 05-16-2006 20:02 |
| Help - monitoring chain involves my chin! | guttadaj | Recording Techniques | 3 | 05-08-2004 00:00 |
| NEWBIES using stereo sound cards Article on how to set up your monitoring. | manning1 | Newbies | 10 | 01-08-2004 05:19 |
| Monitoring equipment: some unconventional wisdom | jeffree | Other Equipment and Reviews | 16 | 10-27-2003 18:57 |
| Monitoring settings via delta soundcard | frist44 | Cubase User Forum | 0 | 12-04-2001 16:43 |