Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Studio Building & Display


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2006
pandamonk's Avatar
pandamonk pandamonk is offline
Three Thousand and Counting
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Age: 21
Posts: 3,115
Rep Power: 201966
pandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond repute
Auralex

Hi, I've been put under the impression by guys from here that auralex products have worse coefficients that rigid fiberglass etc, especially in the bass, but i just went onto their site and found this which shows that they have products with coefficients such as:

125Hz 250Hz 500Hz 1KHz 2KHz 4KHz
VENUS Bass Traps 1.63 1.34 1.29 1.26 1.25 1.20
LENRD Bass Traps 1.24 1.28 1.45 1.39 1.27 1.31
Sunburst Males 1.08 1.23 1.14 1.07 1.05 1.08



I know how much more expensive they are than rigid fiberglass and this is probably the reason why it is recommended. Does anyone have coefficients of a 4" rigid fiberglass bass trap staddeling a corner? Would these be better than the auralex ones? I think if they are advertising these products as "bass" traps, they should show the coeffients down is the lowest audible bass frequencies! Do you do this with real traps Ethan?!!?!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2006
pandamonk's Avatar
pandamonk pandamonk is offline
Three Thousand and Counting
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Age: 21
Posts: 3,115
Rep Power: 201966
pandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond reputepandamonk has a reputation beyond repute
Just noticed why the auralex coefficients are so good. They are 12" deep, i think, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2006
myfipie myfipie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
myfipie is on a distinguished road
There is not a darn thing wrong with there product just so you understand what you are buying. There Venus bass trap as you can see works pretty well as does there 4" foam for first reflections. The problem as I see it is there bass traps just pick up to much high end vs traps like real traps and ours pick more low end but not as much high end. This way you can put a lot of traps in the room and it will not go dead on the high end.

Glenn
__________________
GIK Acoustics
www.gikacoustics.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2006
bpape's Avatar
bpape bpape is offline
Acoustic Designer - GIK
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wildwood, MO (St. Louis)
Age: 50
Posts: 653
Rep Power: 36970
bpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond repute
Also consider that when you look at numbers, those are for a unit of area. Look at the surface area exposed in each one of those when mounted as designed. Then look at the surface area of a 4" pc of mineral wool, 703, or a pre-made solution like the GIK panels.

When considering the cost, look not only at the numbers but what each piece will do for your room.

For instance, say (price found on the web) that 8 of the LENRDs will run you about $280. That's 16 linear feet of corner covered with about 17 or 18" IIRC of surface area so about 24 Sq Ft so about $11.70 per square foot.

Compare to 12 pcs of 703 cut into triangles to make a solid chunk with a 2' exposed face. Those 12 pcs will give you 32 sq ft and be thicker at their deepest and reach deeper down into the bass. The 703 can be purchased for about $200 including shipping depending on where you are and if you can get it locally. That works out to about $6.25/Sq Ft.

Now granted, the Auralex is a 'finished' solution that you can hang directly out of the box. That convenience is worth something. If you want a non-DIY solution, the new GIK Tri-Traps offer the larger surface area and thicker depth coupled with a denser core in a nice looking cloth covered finished absorber that is putting up some impressive numbers.

Compare the 3 solutions in terms of price but also in terms of Sabines absorbed per dollar spent - not just coefficients per unit area.
__________________
I am serious... and don't call me Shirley
GIK Acoustics
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2006
fraserhutch's Avatar
fraserhutch fraserhutch is offline
Flypaper for freaks
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kirkland, Washington
Posts: 3,811
Rep Power: 427631
fraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond repute
I happily use Auralex on my walls, but I also built bass traps and made foam panels from from 703. I would not use Auralex alone, but it is decent at what it does (which is NOT bass traps...)
__________________
The fact that no one understands you doesn't mean you're an artist...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 92sq feet of Auralex foam, $130. Diffusion Free Ads for Music / Recording Equipment 7 04-18-2006 21:08
Auralex for Corner Recording ThaArtist Studio Building & Display 16 12-07-2005 12:32
MF/GC Auralex.... Worth it??? turnitdown Other Equipment and Reviews 7 06-09-2004 15:53
Auralex Foam Kits twonky Studio Building & Display 12 09-28-2003 15:41
Auralex RC8 JPickman Studio Building & Display 3 08-27-2002 12:30


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.