Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Recording Techniques


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2006
stickbugg stickbugg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 9
stickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of light
Crappy Factory Plugins?

This is the best section I could find more this topic.

I've noticed when mixing down my recordings and encoding via a LAME VBR APS preset, that my songs all come out with low bitrates.

My question is whether (in general), the plugins that come with programs like Cubase, Protools and Audition/CoolEdit (what I have), tend to be of lesser quality and thus remove detail from the recorded WAVs. I'm not sure if I explained that right, or not. In other words, should I keep using Auditions plugins, or is it a good idea to use other plugins?

Maybe it's not even the effects processing which is making my MP3 bitrates so low. Does it have to with 16 or 32 bit recording? Does it have to do entirely with the exciters in mastering? Maybe my mics aren't sufficient for that?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2006
tarnationsauce2's Avatar
tarnationsauce2 tarnationsauce2 is offline
Welcome to the jungle.
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ▲ ☻ Oregon, USA ☻ ▲
Posts: 880
Rep Power: 115711
tarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond reputetarnationsauce2 has a reputation beyond repute
That has nothing to do with the plugins. It's the fact that you are using LAME VBR (mp3) for your mixdowns.
Mp3 data is a lossy format, therefore it will loose some high end and artifacts will be introduced.
Only use Mp3's for the internet, and your portable music player. Never for critical audio situations, such as a final mixdown.
Usually it's best to mixdown in WAV format.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2006
SouthSIDE Glen's Avatar
SouthSIDE Glen SouthSIDE Glen is offline
independentrecording.net
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, IL. USA
Age: 50
Posts: 8,435
Rep Power: 1566206
SouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond repute
No, that's not what he's asking.

Stick is saying that he is using a variable bit rate encoder to encode his MP3s, and that compared to what he's used to seeing with commercial releases encoded the same way, that the encoding bit rates are coming in at lower rates on his homebrew recordings.

Stick, it's got little to with crappy plugins. It's probably because you - like 90% of other home recordists - are making recordings with crippled dynamics and almost no useful content above 12kHz.

Why? Probably a whole bunch or reasons. Not the least of which you're probably using your average home recording mics into your average home recording preamps through a cheap digital converter, and your content is mostly electric guitar with heavy midrange distortion. And once you are getting it into Audition, the plug-in you are using the heaviest is the compressor. I may be making some bad assumptions there, but I'll bet you I'm not too far off, am I?

G.
__________________
Glen J. Stephan,
SouthSIDE Multimedia Productions

RECORDING RESOURCES AND INFO SITE:
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-20-2006
stickbugg stickbugg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 9
stickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of light
You hit the mark exactly with what I meant.

Our stuff is mostly distorted, but I only used about 8db of compression on bass guitar and vocals. I used a bunch of eq plugins, because track eqs in Audition are 3-band only.

I am using Apex mics into Behringer board into RME soundcard. All mediocre equipment, I'd say.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-20-2006
SouthSIDE Glen's Avatar
SouthSIDE Glen SouthSIDE Glen is offline
independentrecording.net
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, IL. USA
Age: 50
Posts: 8,435
Rep Power: 1566206
SouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond reputeSouthSIDE Glen has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickbugg
You hit the mark exactly with what I meant.

Our stuff is mostly distorted, but I only used about 8db of compression on bass guitar and vocals. I used a bunch of eq plugins, because track eqs in Audition are 3-band only.
Yeah, honestly, I wouldn't be too suprised or worried about what the VBR is doing with your stuff. Without a lot of dynamics and double-digit HF content, the compression job for the encoder is probably relatively easy; hence the low bit rates. As long as the stuff sound good for you, that's all that matters.

G.
__________________
Glen J. Stephan,
SouthSIDE Multimedia Productions

RECORDING RESOURCES AND INFO SITE:
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-20-2006
stickbugg stickbugg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 9
stickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of lightstickbugg is a glorious beacon of light
OK, thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VST question and other plugins dmc777 Other Equipment and Reviews 3 12-28-2005 18:53
Nomad Factory Plugins? dmc777 Other Equipment and Reviews 0 12-21-2005 12:33
For the "I only have crappy gear" crowd... Massive Master Mixing / Mastering 21 06-10-2005 23:54
Performance issues with plugins Englebert Cakewalk / Sonar Forum 13 10-06-2003 06:56
Plugins being applied 2X??? MartyMcFly Recording Techniques 5 02-25-2003 09:34


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.