Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Mixing / Mastering


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-2006
Vigilante's Avatar
Vigilante Vigilante is offline
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: AZ USA
Age: 28
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 33
Vigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond reputeVigilante has a reputation beyond repute
Point me in the right direction about EQ after the recording...

Hi again, been a while since I milked you all for info

Here is the deal, at church everything is EQ'd to come out the mains, it sounds alright there. But somehow the output of the mixer to our recorder sounds absolutely nothing like the mains. We're not sure if the recorder is screwing it up, or the mixer is not outputting the same signal as the mains out? Who knows? But the point of this post is, I'm interrested in playing with the recordings, trying to EQ them after the fact to get some better sound out of them, because it's almost embarassing. The tones are all muddled, nothing seems crisp, and some of the background effects from drums or whatever just get lost entirely over the louder instruments.

YES I KNOW that EQ is best to do before recording, lol, but in this case I must try to fix this up a bit after the fact. And for the most part my method works just fine, fine enough for me.

What I do now is very simple, I just open the MP3 in Winamp, using its 10 band EQ I set a nice little wave to bring up bass, drop mids, and bring highs WAY up. Each song slightly different but this wave makes it sound pretty good. Then I change Winamp to output to file and save the EQ'd version back to MP3.

Here is the problem, or maybe it's not a problem? The original MP3s are in a decent 192kbps bit rate at 44khz. Winamp settings only seem to go as high as 56kbps and 22khz (I need the sample rate to be a multiple of 22).
This is obviously less then desired quality, I would want at least the same 192kbps. Secondly, could I get a better sound from more then a 10band EQ?

So my question really is, assuming I MUST EQ a MP3 file after recording to get it sounding better, what would be a simple program or method of EQing the file and saving at decent quality? Is 10 bands enough? Is 56kbps @ 22khz good enough for the masses?

What would you suggest? And don't say get a new mixer or recording device, cause they are both new! I don't know the models off hand but I think the mixer is a 16 channel yamaha, recorder might be yamaha too, I think, not sure on that. And our sound guys are pretty well experienced in audio equipment.

And since I'm on the subject of mixing software, it would be cool to have the software increase the volume to max without clipping, cause some audio is recorded pretty weak. And have a few basic effects I could try like reverb. And make it simple to just play with the settings while the song plays, listening to how it sounds until it sounds good, then hit export and be done.
Oh, and very important to ask as well, what else could I do beside an EQ to give the audio some punch? Some other effect or filter I can run it through?

Thanks.
__________________
Drums and piano. What else was there again???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2006
noisewreck's Avatar
noisewreck noisewreck is online now
Sound Destroyer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCali
Age: 100
Posts: 1,823
Rep Power: 1008745
noisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond repute
I hear Reason's mixdown button is just the ticket.
__________________
Quote:
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
--George Carlin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2006
noisewreck's Avatar
noisewreck noisewreck is online now
Sound Destroyer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCali
Age: 100
Posts: 1,823
Rep Power: 1008745
noisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond repute
Alright, sorry, now that I got that out of my system...

You could try a wave editor program such as Wavelab or SoundForge. You can the use plugin EQs from any number of vendors such as Voxengo, Waves, etc. To bring the levels up w/o clipping you'll need a limiter. Finally for "punch" use a compressor.
__________________
Quote:
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
--George Carlin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2006
ryanlikestorock ryanlikestorock is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 29
Posts: 524
Rep Power: 16
ryanlikestorock is a splendid one to beholdryanlikestorock is a splendid one to beholdryanlikestorock is a splendid one to beholdryanlikestorock is a splendid one to beholdryanlikestorock is a splendid one to beholdryanlikestorock is a splendid one to beholdryanlikestorock is a splendid one to beholdryanlikestorock is a splendid one to behold
I think Itunes would encode the mp3 at a higher quality and it's a free program. Stick with 192 if that's what you've been given.

There are no rules. However, a cheap EQ isn't going to make anything sound better in the end. I'd suggest PSP Master Q. It's cheap and sounds amazing for the price.
__________________
Ryan A. Mills
Little King Studio
Joao Carvalho Mastering
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PC recording, not for the fence-sitters Diragor Digital Recording & Computers 11 02-28-2006 17:26
THE DAVEMANIA COLLECTION Glorifies HOME RECORDING and GUITAR/BASS MUSIC! A Reel Person Guitars and Basses 5 12-15-2001 14:56
THE DAVEMANIA COLLECTION Glorifies HOME RECORDING! A Reel Person Newbies 1 12-15-2001 01:41
THE DAVEMANIA COLLECTION Glorifies HOME RECORDING, MIXING & MASTERING! A Reel Person Mixing / Mastering 4 12-15-2001 01:09


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 15:32.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.